Navigating the TMDL Process
Author: P. L. Freedman
Publisher: International Water Assn
Published: 2003
Total Pages: 372
ISBN-13: 9781843396741
DOWNLOAD EBOOK →The objective of this research was to review the e
Author: P. L. Freedman
Publisher: International Water Assn
Published: 2003
Total Pages: 372
ISBN-13: 9781843396741
DOWNLOAD EBOOK →The objective of this research was to review the e
Author: Paul L. Freedman
Publisher: IWA Publishing
Published: 2003-12-01
Total Pages: 116
ISBN-13: 1843396718
DOWNLOAD EBOOK →Narrative water quality criteria are an integral component of States water quality standards but they pose special problems when incorporated into the TMDL process. The TMDL process is typically a quantitative activity, defining numeric allowable loads necessary to meet a numeric water quality objective. Narrative criteria confound development of quantitative TMDLs, due to the absence of these numeric criteria. The objective of this research was to improve the methods for addressing narrative water quality criteria in the TMDL process. The problems associated with narrative criteria in the TMDL process are known in general terms but, prior to this research, there has not been a thorough review of the use of narrative criteria in TMDLs nor broad guidance on how to address narrative criteria in the TMDL process. The approach taken for this research was to define the range of problems associated with all types of narrative criteria by means of a comprehensive review of 120 narrative TMDLs, and provide guiding principles to help address these problems.
Author: Kent W. Thornton
Publisher:
Published: 2003
Total Pages:
ISBN-13: 9781572782150
DOWNLOAD EBOOK →Author: P. L. Freedman
Publisher:
Published: 2003-01-01
Total Pages: 400
ISBN-13: 9781893664807
DOWNLOAD EBOOK →Author: Kent W. Thornton
Publisher:
Published: 2003-01-01
Total Pages: 120
ISBN-13: 9781893664753
DOWNLOAD EBOOK →Author: P. L. Freedman
Publisher:
Published: 2003-01-01
Total Pages: 120
ISBN-13: 9781893664890
DOWNLOAD EBOOK →Author: J. Hyde
Publisher: IWA Publishing
Published: 2003-06-30
Total Pages: 0
ISBN-13: 9781843396635
DOWNLOAD EBOOK →This report offers recommendations for improving the listing and delisting process emerging from surveys of 8 states and review/discussion with other selected states. The report evaluates alternatives and options for reducing uncertainty in each of the four major listing-delisting elements, including WQS (designated uses and water quality criteria), water quality data acquisition, comparative methodology, list content and format. Based on these state surveys, reviews of the FACA Committee, NRC Subcommittee on TMDLs and Water Quality Management, and Project Team experience, the report proposes a set of minimum activities, a number of alternatives and options, and a comprehensive approach for reducing uncertainty in the listing and delisting process.
Author: J. Hyde
Publisher: International Water Assn
Published: 2003-01-01
Total Pages: 136
ISBN-13: 9781843396635
DOWNLOAD EBOOK →This report offers recommendations for improving the listing and delisting process emerging from surveys of 8 states and review/discussion with other selected states.
Author: R. Tjeerdema
Publisher: IWA Publishing
Published: 2007-09-30
Total Pages: 0
ISBN-13: 9781843397663
DOWNLOAD EBOOK →A key step in the development of Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) allocations for water bodies impaired due to sediment toxicity is the identification of chemicals responsible for toxicity. Sediment toxicity identification evaluation procedures (TIEs) are one of the primary tools used in this process. This project evaluated standardized and recently developed sediment TIE methods developed by the US EPA and others, to determine their utility for identifying chemicals responsible for toxicity. In this study, formulated sediments were spiked with five chemicals: copper, fluoranthene, tetrachlorobenzene, nonylphenol and ammonia. Experiments were conducted using sediments spiked with single chemicals and chemical mixtures. Toxicity tests used the estuarine amphipod Eohaustorius estuarius and the freshwater amphipod Hyalella azteca. TIEs were conducted using solid-phase (whole sediment) and sediment interstitial waters. Results indicate that the TIE methods are sufficient to characterize and identify toxicity due to single and multiple chemicals using spiked sediments. One key finding from the spiked sediment experiments is that methods to elute chemicals from extraction media used in solid-phase and interstitial water TIEs require further refinement to ensure complete and consistent elution of sorbed chemicals. An additional finding is that both solid-phase and interstitial water TIE procedures provide useful lines of evidence and that both approaches should be used in a weight-of-evidence approach in the sediment TIE process. In the final phase of this project, we evaluated the TIE procedures using ambient samples collected from three marine sites and three freshwater sites. Marine sediments were collected from Switzer Creek in San Diego Bay, Upper Newport Bay in Newport Beach, and Consolidated Slip, in Long Beach Harbor, all of which are sites in southern California. Freshwater sediments were collected from two additional sites in California: San Diego Creek, in Newport Beach, and Alisal Slough, in Salinas. The final freshwater sediment was collected from a site in Indiana Harbor. Multiple solid-phase and interstitial water TIEs were conducted on each sediment and results of these were combined with chemical analyses and other lines-of-evidence to evaluate the methods. The results indicate that sediment TIE methods are sufficiently developed to characterize toxicity due to general classes of chemicals such as cationic metals, organic chemicals, and ammonia. Methods to improve extraction and elution of metal and organic chemicals in highly toxic sediments require further refinement in order to allow identification of specific chemicals responsible for toxicity as part of the Phase II TIE process. These refinements include determining the appropriate masses of solid-phase extraction media to allow complete removal of toxic chemicals from sediments and interstitial waters. In addition, we recommend that additional studies be designed to determine optimal equilibration periods to maximize removal of toxic chemicals using resin amendments in solid-phase sediment TIEs. As in the spiked-sediment TIEs, we observed inconsistent elution of toxic chemicals from extraction media used in solid-phase and interstitial water Phase II TIEs with the ambient samples. These procedures require additional work to ensure that chemicals responsible for toxicity are completely eluted from extraction media. Improvement of the Phase II TIE elution and solvent handling steps should facilitate better identification of chemicals responsible for toxicity, particularly in situations where toxicity is due to highly insoluble chemicals. When these considerations are satisfactorily addressed, the methods evaluated are capable of providing useful lines of evidence that can be combined to successfully identify sediment toxicants.