Presidential Vetoes and Public Policy

Presidential Vetoes and Public Policy PDF

Author: Richard Abernathy Watson

Publisher: Studies in Government and Public Policy

Published: 1993

Total Pages: 240

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK →

An analysis of presidential vetoes from FDR to Jimmy Carter which clarifies the problems caused by the veto and reveals how it has shaped public policy, Watson concludes that the veto power has operated well both in terms of public policy and relations between Congress and the president and argues that it would be a mistake to alter it through the adoption of an item veto.

Veto Bargaining

Veto Bargaining PDF

Author: Charles M. Cameron

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Published: 2000-06-19

Total Pages: 316

ISBN-13: 9780521625500

DOWNLOAD EBOOK →

Combining game theory with unprecedented data, this book analyzes how divided party Presidents use threats and vetoes to wrest policy concessions from a hostile congress.

The Presidential Veto

The Presidential Veto PDF

Author: Robert J. Spitzer

Publisher: State University of New York Press

Published: 1988-08-09

Total Pages: 206

ISBN-13: 143842082X

DOWNLOAD EBOOK →

This is the first modern study of the veto. In addition to tracing the genesis and historical evolution from Ancient Rome, through the ultimate inclusion in the Constitution, it also explores the veto's consequences for modern presidents. In doing so, Spitzer promotes a key argument about the relation between the veto power and the Presidency — namely, that the rise of the veto power, beginning with the first Chief Executive, is symptomatic of the rise of the strong modern Presidency, and has in fact been a major tool of Presidency-building. A special and revealing irony of the veto power is seen in the finding that, despite its monarchical roots and anti-majoritarian nature, the veto has become a key vehicle for presidents to appeal directly to, and on behalf of, the people. Thus, the veto's utility for presidents arises not only as a power to use against Congress, but also as a symbolic, plebiscitary tool.