The Report of the Quadrennial Defense Review
Author: Quadrennial Defense Review (U.S.)
Publisher:
Published: 1997
Total Pages:
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOK →Author: Quadrennial Defense Review (U.S.)
Publisher:
Published: 1997
Total Pages:
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOK →Author: William S. Cohen
Publisher: DIANE Publishing
Published: 1997
Total Pages: 106
ISBN-13: 9780788145452
DOWNLOAD EBOOK →Partial contents include: (1) Design, Approach, and Implementation of the Quadrennial Defense Review; (2) The Global Security Environment; (3) Defense Strategy; (4) Alternative Defense Postures; (5) Forces and Manpower; (6) Force Readiness; (7) Transforming U.S. Forces For the Future; (8) Achieving a 21st Century Defense Infrastructure; (9) Defense Resources Section; and (10) Comments by the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
Author: United States. General Accounting Office
Publisher:
Published: 1998
Total Pages: 64
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOK →Author:
Publisher: DIANE Publishing
Published: 2010-08
Total Pages: 128
ISBN-13: 1437929486
DOWNLOAD EBOOK →Author: United States Congress
Publisher: Createspace Independent Publishing Platform
Published: 2017-10-10
Total Pages: 202
ISBN-13: 9781978119352
DOWNLOAD EBOOK →The report of the Quadrennial Defense Review Independent Panel: hearing before the Committee on Armed Services, United States Senate, One Hundred Eleventh Congress, second session, August 3, 2010.
Author: United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Armed Services
Publisher:
Published: 2011
Total Pages: 204
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOK →Author: John Y. Schrader
Publisher: RAND Corporation
Published: 2001
Total Pages: 74
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOK →The problems and issues that the research team tracked during QDR 1997 are far from being resolved and there is no clear guidance on what will be demanded in QDR 2001. The services remain skeptical of the Joint Staff dealing with tough issues that could redirect their own programmatic decisions. Although there is promise of improvement in organization and process, the most glaring problems are the lack of a comprehensive approach to treating resources and understanding the effects of resources on strategy adn transformation alternatives. It is essential that good working relationships be established now with a clear understanding of the different responsibilities and capabilities of the Joint Staff and the Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD). It will be important to identify an appropriate set of mega-issues (with an appropriate set of supporting specific issues) and initiate studies and analysis on the most important ones.
Author:
Publisher:
Published: 1998
Total Pages: 0
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOK →In its May 1995 report, the Commission on Roles and Missions of the Armed Forces recommended that DOD lead a comprehensive strategy and force review at the start of each new administration. In August 1995, the Secretary of Defense endorsed performing a quadrennial review of the defense program. Congress, noting the Secretary's intent to complete the first such review in 1997, required in the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1997 that DOD report on a number of topics, including the defense strategy; the force structure best suited to implement the strategy; the effect of new technologies anticipated by 2005 on force structure, doctrine, and operational concepts; and key assumptions used in the review. It also authorized a National Defense Panel, comprising national security experts from the private sector, to review the results of the QDR and conduct a subsequent study to identify and assess force alternatives. DOD completed the QDR in May 1997 and the Panel issued its report in December 1997.
Author: John Y. Schrader
Publisher: RAND Corporation
Published: 2003
Total Pages: 68
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOK →As an After-action report, this documented briefing summatizes analysis performed for the Joint STaff in preparation for and in support of the second Quadrennial Defense Review(QDR). The authors concluded that QDR 2001 like QDR 1997, was useful inproviding information on requirements for military capabilties and resource. The report recommend that the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff use existing processes to routinely address cross-cutting issues from a military perpective.