Change in View

Change in View PDF

Author: Gilbert Harman

Publisher: MIT Press (MA)

Published: 1986

Total Pages: 160

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK →

Change in View offers an entirely original approach to the philosophical study of reasoning by identifying principles of reasoning with principles for revising one's beliefs and intentions and not with principles of logic. This crucial observation leads to a number of important and interesting consequences that impinge on psychology and artificial intelligence as well as on various branches of philosophy, from epistemology to ethics and action theory. Gilbert Harman is Professor of Philosophy at Princeton University. A Bradford Book.

The Little Blue Reasoning Book

The Little Blue Reasoning Book PDF

Author: Brandon Royal

Publisher: Maven Publishing

Published: 2013-01-01

Total Pages: 295

ISBN-13: 1897393601

DOWNLOAD EBOOK →

The Little Blue Reasoning Book helps readers build essential critical thinking, creative thinking, and decision-making skills and is suitable for the everyday student, test-prep candidate, or working professional in need of a refresher course. Interwoven within the book's five chapters -Perception & Mindset, Decision Making, Creative Thinking, Analyzing Arguments, and Mastering Logic - are 50 reasoning tips that summarize the common themes behind classic reasoning problems and situations. Appendixes contain summaries of fallacious reasoning, analogies, trade-offs, and a review of critical reading.

Theory and Evidence

Theory and Evidence PDF

Author: Barbara Koslowski

Publisher: MIT Press

Published: 1996

Total Pages: 326

ISBN-13: 9780262112093

DOWNLOAD EBOOK →

Koslowski boldly criticizes many of the currently classic studies and musters a compelling set of arguments, backed by an exhaustive set of experiments carried out during the last decade.

Reasoning with Rules

Reasoning with Rules PDF

Author: Jaap Hage

Publisher: Springer Science & Business Media

Published: 2013-04-17

Total Pages: 280

ISBN-13: 9401588732

DOWNLOAD EBOOK →

Rule-applying legal arguments are traditionally treated as a kind of syllogism. Such a treatment overlooks the fact that legal principles and rules are not statements which describe the world, but rather means by which humans impose structure on the world. Legal rules create legal consequences, they do not describe them. This has consequences for the logic of rule- and principle-applying arguments, the most important of which may be that such arguments are defeasible. This book offers an extensive analysis of the role of rules and principles in legal reasoning, which focuses on the close relationship between rules, principles, and reasons. Moreover, it describes a logical theory which assigns a central place to the notion of reasons for and against a conclusion, and which is especially suited to deal with rules and principles.

Lanterna Rally - Theme by Grace Themes