The Medical Malpractice Myth

The Medical Malpractice Myth PDF

Author: Tom Baker

Publisher: ReadHowYouWant.com

Published: 2011-03

Total Pages: 386

ISBN-13: 1459615654

DOWNLOAD EBOOK →

n January 2005, President Bush declared the medical malpractice liability system out of control.The president's speech was merely an echo of what doctors and politicians (mostly Republicans) have been saying for years - that medical malpractice premiums are skyrocketing due to an explosion in malpractice litigation. Along comes Baker, direct...

The Medical Malpractice Myth

The Medical Malpractice Myth PDF

Author: Mary Irene Coombs

Publisher:

Published: 2006

Total Pages: 0

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK →

In this review essay, I describe the recent book by Tom Baker, The Medical Malpractice Myth and explicate its deconstruction of five such myths: that there are numerous malpractice suits that are frivolous and yet the plaintiffs obtain large judgments; and that these have led to significant social costs through defensive medicine, skyrocketing malpractice insurance rates and the exit of good physicians from the practice of medicine. I then, however, suggest that the belief of physicians in these myths are deeply embedded and unlikely to be changed by the presentation of these facts and that real reform cannot succeed if opposed by the medical profession. Finally, I suggest that a reconceptualization of the malpractice tort to focus on systemic error rather than individual blameworthy conduct offers the best chance to align the interest of patients, physicians and health insurers.

Medical Malpractice Litigation

Medical Malpractice Litigation PDF

Author: Bernard S. Black

Publisher: Cato Institute

Published: 2021-04-27

Total Pages: 337

ISBN-13: 194864780X

DOWNLOAD EBOOK →

"Drawing on an unusually rich trove of data, the authors have refuted more politically convenient myths in one book than most academics do in a lifetime." —Nicholas Bagley, professor of law, University of Michigan Law School "Synthesizing decades of their own and others’ research on medical liability, the authors unravel what we know and don’t know about our medical malpractice system, why neither patients nor doctors are being rightly served, and what economics can teach us about the path forward." —Anupam B. Jena, Harvard Medical School Over the past 50 years, the United States experienced three major medical malpractice crises, each marked by dramatic increases in the cost of malpractice liability insurance. These crises fostered a vigorous politicized debate about the causes of the premium spikes, and the impact on access to care and defensive medicine. State legislatures responded to the premium spikes by enacting damages caps on non-economic, punitive, or total damages and Congress has periodically debated the merits of a federal cap on damages. However, the intense political debate has been marked by a shortage of evidence, as well as misstatements and overclaiming. The public is confused about answers to some basic questions. What caused the premium spikes? What effect did tort reform actually have? Did tort reform reduce frivolous litigation? Did tort reform actually improve access to health care or reduce defensive medicine? Both sides in the debate have strong opinions about these matters, but their positions are mostly talking points or are based on anecdotes. Medical Malpractice Litigation provides factual answers to these and other questions about the performance of the med mal system. The authors, all experts in the field and from across the political spectrum, provide an accessible, fact-based response to the questions ordinary Americans and policymakers have about the performance of the med mal litigation system.

Lethal Medicine

Lethal Medicine PDF

Author: Harvey F. Wachsman

Publisher: Henry Holt and Company

Published: 2015-03-03

Total Pages: 275

ISBN-13: 146689170X

DOWNLOAD EBOOK →

With America's health-care system in the midst of upheaval, and with government officials, physicians, and the public-at-large focused as never before on the cost and quality of these vital services, a hidden epidemic--medical malpractice--destroys hundreds of thousands of lives each year and is ignored by the majority of the medical establishment. Lethal Medicine is the first book to thoroughly examine malpractice, and its author, Harvey F. Wachsman, M.D., J.D., as both a respected neurosurgeon and the leading attorney in the field, is uniquely qualified to critique this problem from every angle. Using numerous case histories and authoritative data from university and government studies, Wachsman explodes the common myths that doctors are spending millions of dollars on "defensive medicine" and that the high cost of malpractice insurance is driving many doctors out of their practices. In fact, he argues that most malpractice cases actually do result from egregious abuses by doctors. Reviewing the latest court rulings and malpractice policies, Wachsman calls for the lgal community, government, and medical establishment to protect the public from the thousands of physicians who continue to practice irresponsible medicine without penalty. As Washington makes health care one of its highest priorities and the nation turns its attention to the issue, Lethal Medicine is a thoughtful yet urgent cry for reform by the nation's foremost expert on the topic.

Medical Malpractice

Medical Malpractice PDF

Author: Richard E. Anderson

Publisher: Springer Science & Business Media

Published: 2007-11-05

Total Pages: 307

ISBN-13: 1592598455

DOWNLOAD EBOOK →

Books such as this one are deceptively difficult to create. The general subject is neither happy, nor easy, nor most anyone’s idea of fun. M- practice litigation, however, has become a central fact of existence in the practice of medicine today. This tsunami of lawsuits has led to a high volume of irreconcilable rhetoric and ultimately threatens the stability of the entire health care system. Our goal has been to provide a source of reliable information on a subject of importance to all who provide me- cal care in the United States. The book is divided into four sections. Part I gives an overview of insurance in general and discusses the organization of professional - ability insurance companies in particular. Part II focuses on the litigation process itself with views from the defense and plaintiff bar, and the physician as both expert and defendant. Part III looks at malpractice litigation from the viewpoint of the practicing physician. Some of the chapters are broadly relevant to all doctors—the rise of e-medicine, and the importance of effective communication, for example. The other ch- ters are constructed around individual medical specialties, but discuss issues that are of potential interest to all. Part IV looks ahead. “The Case for Legal Reform” presents changes in medical-legal jurisprudence that can be of immediate benefit. The final two chapters take a broader perspective on aspects of our entire health care system and its interface with law and public policy.

Medical Malpractice Myths and Realities

Medical Malpractice Myths and Realities PDF

Author: Thomas Owen McGarity

Publisher:

Published: 2011

Total Pages: 0

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK →

The United States is suffering both from a healthcare crisis, one of the symptoms of which is an unnecessarily high number of malpractice injuries, and from an insurance crisis. There is, however, no tort lawsuit crisis - in medical malpractice liability or otherwise. The insurance industry, managed-care companies, and organizations representing healthcare providers have invested a great amount of money in political contributions and media campaigns to convince policy-makers and the public that the civil justice system is fraught with meritless claims and is consequently the cause of the recent increase in malpractice premiums. But a mounting number of studies are finding that the tort system in general and malpractice liability in particular have been quite stable for the past two decades. And examinations of insurance industry practices reveal insurers' business decisions as the source of premium volatility - not the amount insurers are paying out on malpractice claim. More specifically, the recent premium spikes were insurance companies' attempt to make up for losses that they incurred as a result of offering artificially low premiums to increase their market share and depending instead on projected income from risky investments to meet future payout obligations. In addition to shifting the blame for skyrocketing malpractice premiums from insurance companies to the civil justice system, corporate interests and the politicians they support have shifted the blame for the alarming lack of access to affordable, quality healthcare from the for-profit entities that run the U.S. healthcare system to malpractice victims and their attorneys. More specifically, advocates of restrictions on medical malpractice liability claim that rampant lawsuit abuse is driving physicians to practice so-called defensive medicine and to leave the medical field, both of which increase healthcare costs and diminish healthcare availability. Given the overwhelming evidence of stability in the civil justice system, it is not surprising that neither the defensive-medicine claim nor the physician-flight claim withstand empirical scrutiny. The Bush administration's primary support for the claim that doctors are ordering unnecessary tests and procedures out of fear of being sued in a study that two non-partisan congressional research agencies have dismissed as unreliable because it projects extremely limited findings onto the entire nation. More appropriately designed studies have found little or no evidence that fear of liability results in unnecessary medical expenditures. And regarding the supposed physician flight, the Government Accountability Office recently reported that the physician supply in this country has been increasing faster than the population for the past decade. In short, the Bush administration, other tort reform politicians, and big businesses have fabricated a lawsuit crisis to defraud the American people of their right to redress for wrongful injury and their ability to hold the perpetrators - no matter how wealthy and powerful - accountable in the civil justice system. Information readily available to the administration and federal legislators promoting tort reform makes clear that civil justice system is not inundated with baseless claims, that insurance companies' losses in malpractice lawsuits are not driving premium hikes, that doctors are not disappearing, and that there is no surge in defensive medicine responsible for increased healthcare costs. Thus, the restrictions on medical malpractice liability that President Bush insists Congress must enact serve only to provide immunity (1) for healthcare providers who commit malpractice by denying victims access to the courts, and (2) for insurance companies, who raised premiums to recover from losses incurred as a result of their imprudent business practices and who now seek to evade responsibility for this imprudence and to maximize future profits by blaming malpractice victims for the premium hikes. Furthermore, the healthcare crisis will continue as long as the nation's focus remains fixed on a chimerical cause of that crisis - i.e., the civil justice system - instead of the real causes - i.e., the insurance, managed-care, and pharmaceutical industries that largely control healthcare delivery in the United States. Addressing the healthcare crisis requires ensuring everyone access to quality healthcare, which, in turn, requires reining in these corporations, not immunizing them from citizens' check on the public health risks posed by their profit-maximizing behavior.

Magnetic Appeal

Magnetic Appeal PDF

Author: Kelly Joyce

Publisher: Cornell University Press

Published: 2010-12-15

Total Pages: 208

ISBN-13: 0801460514

DOWNLOAD EBOOK →

Magnetic Resonance Imaging, not so long ago a diagnostic tool of last resort, has become pervasive in the landscape of consumer medicine; images of the forbidding tubes, with their promises of revelation, surround us in commercials and on billboards. Magnetic Appeal offers an in-depth exploration of the science and culture of MRI, examining its development and emergence as an imaging technology, its popular appeal and acceptance, and its current use in health care. Understood as modern and uncontroversial by health care professionals and in public discourse, the importance of MRI—or its supposed infallibility—has rarely been questioned. In Magnetic Appeal, Kelly A. Joyce shows how MRI technology grew out of serendipitous circumstances and was adopted for reasons having little to do with patient safety or evidence of efficacy. Drawing on interviews with physicians and MRI technologists, as well as ethnographic research conducted at imaging sites and radiology conferences, Joyce demonstrates that current beliefs about MRI draw on cultural ideas about sight and technology and are reinforced by health care policies and insurance reimbursement practices. Moreover, her unsettling analysis of physicians' and technologists' work practices lets readers consider that MRI scans do not reveal the truth about the body as is popularly believed, nor do they always lead to better outcomes for patients. Although clearly a valuable medical technique, MRI technology cannot necessarily deliver the health outcomes ascribed to it. Magnetic Appeal also addresses broader questions about the importance of medical imaging technologies in American culture and medicine. These technologies, which include ultrasound, X-ray, and MRI, are part of a larger trend in which visual representations have become central to American health, identity, and social relations.