A Description of U.S. Enlisted Personnel Promotion Systems

A Description of U.S. Enlisted Personnel Promotion Systems PDF

Author:

Publisher:

Published: 1999

Total Pages: 0

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK →

This document summarizes the requirements for promotion of enlisted personnel within each of the services of the U.S. military. This document is not a historical review and does not assess or evaluate the promotion systems. Furthermore, this document does not address the enlisted promotion systems used for the reserves. There is marked variety in the specific requirements for promotion across services. However, there is similarity in the tiered structure of the services' promotion systems. For example, each service developed a tiered enlisted promotion system (Figure S.1). Basically, the first level of the promotion systems controls the promotion of enlisted personnel up to paygrades E-3/E-4. At this level, advancement is noncompetitive and requirements are minimal; generally enlisted personnel need only meet time-in-service (TIS) and time-in-grade (TIG) requirements for advancement. The middle tier covers a wider range of enlisted personnel between paygrades E-4 and E-5/E-7 with competitive advancement based primarily on point systems. The advancement requirements in the top level vary across services. However, at this level, promotion decisions are made primarily by board reviews.

A Description of U.S. Enlisted Personnel Promotion Systems

A Description of U.S. Enlisted Personnel Promotion Systems PDF

Author:

Publisher:

Published: 1999

Total Pages: 53

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK →

This document summarizes the requirements for promotion of enlisted personnel within each of the services of the U.S. military. This document is not a historical review and does not assess or evaluate the promotion systems. Furthermore, this document does not address the enlisted promotion systems used for the reserves. There is marked variety in the specific requirements for promotion across services. However, there is similarity in the tiered structure of the services' promotion systems. For example, each service developed a tiered enlisted promotion system (Figure S.1). Basically, the first level of the promotion systems controls the promotion of enlisted personnel up to paygrades E-3/E-4. At this level, advancement is noncompetitive and requirements are minimal; generally enlisted personnel need only meet time-in-service (TIS) and time-in-grade (TIG) requirements for advancement. The middle tier covers a wider range of enlisted personnel between paygrades E-4 and E-5/E-7 with competitive advancement based primarily on point systems. The advancement requirements in the top level vary across services. However, at this level, promotion decisions are made primarily by board reviews.

Hearings Before the Special Subcommittee on Enlisted Promotion Policy Review, Committee on Armed Services, House of Representatives, Ninetieth Congress, First Session

Hearings Before the Special Subcommittee on Enlisted Promotion Policy Review, Committee on Armed Services, House of Representatives, Ninetieth Congress, First Session PDF

Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on Armed Services. Special Subcommittee on Enlisted Promotion Policy Review

Publisher:

Published: 1968

Total Pages: 870

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK →

Committee Serial No. 38. Investigates armed services promotion requirements and procedures, and the alleged inadequacy of present promotion system. Includes report by Secretary of Navy: "Report of the Secretary of the Navy's Task Force on Navy/Marine Military Personnel Retention" (Jan. 25, 1966, p. 6531-6591).

Hearings on Enlisted Promotion Policy Review

Hearings on Enlisted Promotion Policy Review PDF

Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on Armed Services. Special Subcommittee on Enlisted Promotion Policy Review

Publisher:

Published: 1968

Total Pages: 84

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK →

Committee Serial No. 63. Considers the introduction of regular technical testing into the AF promotion review process to standardize the review process.