Setting Priorities for Large Research Facility Projects Supported by the National Science Foundation

Setting Priorities for Large Research Facility Projects Supported by the National Science Foundation PDF

Author: National Research Council

Publisher: National Academies Press

Published: 2004-07-15

Total Pages: 236

ISBN-13: 0309090849

DOWNLOAD EBOOK →

In 1995, the National Science Foundation (NSF) created a special account to fund large (several tens of millions of dollars) research facilities. Over the years, these facilities have come to represent an increasingly prominent part of the nation's R&D portfolio. Recently concern has intensified about the way NSF is selecting projects for this account. In 2003, six U.S. Senators including the chair and ranking member of the Senate Subcommittee on VA, HUD, and Independent Agencies Appropriations expressed these concerns in a letter to the NRC asking it to "review the current prioritization process and report to us on how it can be improved." This report presents a series of recommendations on how NSF can improve its priority setting process for large research facilities. While noting that NSF has improved this process, the report states that further strengthening is needed if NSF is to meet future demands for such projects.

Major Award Decisionmaking at the National Science Foundation

Major Award Decisionmaking at the National Science Foundation PDF

Author: Institute of Medicine

Publisher: National Academies Press

Published: 1994-02-01

Total Pages: 175

ISBN-13: 0309050294

DOWNLOAD EBOOK →

As part of its mission to foster high-quality scientific and engineering research, the National Science Foundation (NSF) plans, grants, and administers major awards to universities and other research institutions for national research facilities, multidisciplinary research centers, and other large-scale research projects. Although few in number, less than 100, such projects account for about 30 percent of NSF's annual research budget. This book provides a useful overview of how such projects are planned, reviews proposals for merit, and evaluates ongoing projects for renewal awards. The panel makes a series of recommendations for strengthening major award decisionmaking.

Big science

Big science PDF

Author: Great Britain: National Audit Office

Publisher: The Stationery Office

Published: 2007-01-24

Total Pages: 56

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK →

Government invests in a range of large scientific facilities to support and develop the nation's science base. The main components of planning for these facilities are a road map describing large facilities which UK scientists are likely to need in the next 10 to 15 years, and a central fund (the Large Facilities Capital Fund) of around £100 million per year to support investments in such facilities by Research Councils. Currently, £830 million has been earmarked to 15 projects which are expected to cost the UK taxpayer some £1.2 billion to build. (Ten of these projects have now been approved, one of which has been delivered, with the others due for completion in the period to 2011.) The report says it is too early to assess the value for money of the science facilities. To date performance against capital budgets suggests some good budget management, but the latest figures show that, across the ten projects underway, total capital expenditure is forecast to exceed approved budgets by 6 per cent. Some projects are forecasting delivery dates some 12 months or more later than approved. The forecast operating costs of some projects have increased by large amounts compared to estimates when their business cases were approved, and the Research Councils need to do more work to estimate the likely ongoing costs of new facilities. The report says ultimately the value of the facilities will depend on the scientific discoveries they make. It also says that more work is needed by Research Councils to examine the potential impact of new facilities on the future demand for research funding. Full use of these facilities will depend on research ideas competing successfully for research funding.