Physical Security Program (DoD 5200. 08-R)

Physical Security Program (DoD 5200. 08-R) PDF

Author: Department Defense

Publisher: CreateSpace

Published: 2013-01-27

Total Pages: 26

ISBN-13: 9781482095661

DOWNLOAD EBOOK →

This Regulation is issued under the authority of DoD Instruction 5200.08, "Security of DoD Installations and Resources," December 10, 2005. It implements the policies and minimum standards for the physical security of DoD installations and resources.

Handbook for Self-Assessing Security Vulnerabilities and Risk of Industrial Control Systems on Dod Installations

Handbook for Self-Assessing Security Vulnerabilities and Risk of Industrial Control Systems on Dod Installations PDF

Author: Office of Military Commissions Office of the Secretary of Defense

Publisher: CreateSpace

Published: 2014-11-04

Total Pages: 100

ISBN-13: 9781503039278

DOWNLOAD EBOOK →

This handbook is intended for use primarily by Department of Defense (DOD) installation commanders, supported by staff members, as a management tool to self-assess,1 prioritize, and manage mission-related vulnerabilities and risks that may be exposed or created by connectivity to ICS. ICS include a variety of systems or mechanisms used to monitor and/or operate critical infrastructure elements, such as electricity, water, natural gas, fuels, entry and access (doors, buildings, gates), heating & air-conditioning, runway lighting, etc. Other terms often heard include SCADA, DCS, or EMCS.2 Throughout this book the term "ICS" is used as encompassing such variations. This book is intentionally generic. Whatever the category of ICS, the approach to vulnerability assessment and risk management is similar. The applicability of actions recommended here may be extended to any DOD military installation regardless of the specific categories of ICS encountered. In keeping with the generic approach and due primarily to the unique nature of each installation's infrastructure, beyond a couple of exceptions there are no checklists, standard operating procedures (SOP), or similar sets of lock-step actions provided here. However, a risk management team using the handbook likely will want to develop checklists tailored to their specific circumstances. Among other purposes, this handbook is intended to increase awareness of how a threat related to the ICS itself translates into a threat to the mission, either directly through the ICS or circuitously via network connections. Every military installation has numerous mission-support processes and systems controlled by, or that otherwise depend on, ICS. Every connection or access point represents potential vulnerabilities and, therefore, risks to the system under control (i.e., electrical, water, emergency services, etc.), which can escalate quickly to adverse impact on mission essential functions (MEF) and mission accomplishment. Fundamentally then, this handbook is provided to help the installation leadership conduct a risk self-assessment focused on ICS and supported missions and then implement plans to manage that risk. Most of the information contained herein is not unique to this publication. Two unique aspects are: (1) the aggregation of disparate information into one place, distilling essentials, and tailoring to DOD installation leadership; and (2) bringing cyber/information technology (IT), civil engineers, public works, and mission operators together with a singular focus on ICS security in support of missions. This handbook (via Appendices) also points to additional resources.

Capabilities-Based Planning for Energy Security at Department of Defense Installations

Capabilities-Based Planning for Energy Security at Department of Defense Installations PDF

Author: Constantine Samaras

Publisher: Rand Corporation

Published: 2013

Total Pages: 61

ISBN-13: 0833079131

DOWNLOAD EBOOK →

Department of Defense (DoD) installations rely on the commercial electricity grid for 99 percent of their electricity needs, but extensive energy delivery outages in 2012 have reinforced that the U.S. electricity grid is vulnerable to disruptions from natural hazards and actor-induced outages, such as physical or cyber attacks. In the event of a catastrophic disaster--such as a severe hurricane, massive earthquake, or large-scale terrorist attack--DoD installations would also serve as a base for emergency services. To enhance energy security, DoD has identified diversifying energy sources and increasing efficiency in DoD operations as critical goals. But how to enhance energy security across the portfolio of installations is not clear and several questions remain unanswered: Energy security for how long? Under what conditions? At what cost? The underlying analytical questions are, what critical capabilities do U.S. installations provide, and how can DoD maintain these capabilities during an energy services disruption in the most cost-effective manner? Answering these questions requires a systems approach that incorporates technological, economic, and operational uncertainties. Using portfolio analysis methods for assessing capability options, this paper presents a framework to evaluate choices among energy security strategies for DoD installations. This framework evaluates whether existing or proposed installation energy security strategies enhance DoD capabilities and evaluates strategy cost-effectiveness.

The Department of Defense's System of Managing Physical Security at United States Military Bases

The Department of Defense's System of Managing Physical Security at United States Military Bases PDF

Author: Werner Grosshans

Publisher: DIANE Publishing

Published: 2002-05

Total Pages: 56

ISBN-13: 9780756721411

DOWNLOAD EBOOK →

Statement of Werner Grosshans, Deputy Director, Procurement, Logistics and Readiness Division, before the House Armed Services Committee, Investigations Subcommittee, to discuss the subcommittee1s follow-up work on the Dept. of Defense1s (DoD) system of managing physical security at U.S. military bases. The testimony, which is in two parts, on Aug. 12 and Dec. 8, 1982, contains Grosshans1 statement on actions taken by DoD on the recommendations contained in the Subcommittee report dated Nov. 5, 1981, the recommendations in its March 6, 1981 report, and base entry procedures.