Review of NASA's Human Research Program Evidence Books
Author: Institute of Medicine (U.S.). Committee on NASA's Research on Human Health Risks
Publisher:
Published: 2008
Total Pages: 0
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOK →Lanterna Rally
eBook PDF Download Digital Library
Review of NASA's Human Research Program Evidence Books
Author: Board on Health Sciences Policy
Publisher:
Published: 2008
Total Pages:
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOK →Review of NASA's Evidence Reports on Human Health Risks
Author: National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine
Publisher: National Academies Press
Published: 2016-04-15
Total Pages: 83
ISBN-13: 0309380618
DOWNLOAD EBOOK →Review of NASA's Evidence Reports on Human Health Risks 2015 Letter Report is the third in a series of five reports from the Institute of Medicine that will independently review more than 30 evidence reports that the National Aeronautics and Space Administration has compiled on human health risks for long-duration and exploration space flights. This report builds on the 2008 IOM report Review of NASA's Human Research Program Evidence Books: A Letter Report, which provided an initial and brief review of the evidence reports. This letter report reviews seven evidence reports and examines the quality of the evidence, analysis, and overall construction of each report; identifies existing gaps in report content; and provides suggestions for additional sources of expert input. The report analyzes each evidence report's overall quality, which included readability; internal consistency; the source and breadth of cited evidence; identification of existing knowledge and research gaps; authorship expertise; and, if applicable, response to recommendations from the 2008 IOM letter report.
Review of NASA's Evidence Reports on Human Health Risks
Author: Institute of Medicine
Publisher: National Academies Press
Published: 2014-02-28
Total Pages: 45
ISBN-13: 0309296552
DOWNLOAD EBOOK →Review of NASA's Evidence Reports on Human Health Risks: 2013 Letter Report is the first in a series of five reports from the Institute of Medicine that will independently review more than 30 evidence reports that the National Aeronautics and Space Administration has compiled on human health risks for long-duration and exploration space flights. This report builds on the 2008 IOM report Review of NASA's Human Research Program Evidence Books: A Letter Report, which provided an initial and brief review of the evidence reports. This letter report reviews three evidence reports and examines the quality of the evidence, analysis, and overall construction of each report; identifies existing gaps in report content; and provides suggestions for additional sources of expert input. The report analyzes each evidence report's overall quality, which included readability; internal consistency; the source and breadth of cited evidence; identification of existing knowledge and research gaps; authorship expertise; and, if applicable, response to recommendations from the 2008 IOM letter report.
A Review of NASA Human Research Program's Scientific Merit Assessment Processes
Author: Institute of Medicine
Publisher: National Academies Press
Published: 2012-09-20
Total Pages: 53
ISBN-13: 0309260507
DOWNLOAD EBOOK →At the request of NASA, an IOM committee reviewed NASA Human Research Program's (HRP's) Scientific Merit Assessment Processes for directed research. Directed research is commissioned or noncompetitively awarded research that is not competitively solicited because of specific reasons, such as time limitations or highly focused or constrained research topics. The scientific merit assessment processes have been developed by NASA to evaluate individual directed research tasks in order to ensure the scientific integrity of the HRP's directed research portfolio. The committee examined the HRP's current scientific merit assessment processes and conducted a public workshop to identify best practices among other federal agencies that use various assessment processes for similar types of directed research. Review of NASA Human Research Program's Scientific Merit Processes: Letter Report finds that the scientific merit assessment process used by the HRP for directed research is scientifically rigorous and is similar to the processes and merit criteria used by many other federal agencies and organizations - including the Department of Defense, National Institutes of Health, and the United States Department of Agriculture - for comparable types of research. This report also makes recommendations on ways to streamline and bolster the accountability and transparency of NASA's current processes.
A Review of NASA Human Research Program's Scientific Merit Assessment Processes
Author: Institute of Medicine
Publisher: National Academies Press
Published: 2012-08-20
Total Pages: 53
ISBN-13: 0309260531
DOWNLOAD EBOOK →At the request of NASA, an IOM committee reviewed NASA Human Research Program's (HRP's) Scientific Merit Assessment Processes for directed research. Directed research is commissioned or noncompetitively awarded research that is not competitively solicited because of specific reasons, such as time limitations or highly focused or constrained research topics. The scientific merit assessment processes have been developed by NASA to evaluate individual directed research tasks in order to ensure the scientific integrity of the HRP's directed research portfolio. The committee examined the HRP's current scientific merit assessment processes and conducted a public workshop to identify best practices among other federal agencies that use various assessment processes for similar types of directed research. Review of NASA Human Research Program's Scientific Merit Processes: Letter Report finds that the scientific merit assessment process used by the HRP for directed research is scientifically rigorous and is similar to the processes and merit criteria used by many other federal agencies and organizations - including the Department of Defense, National Institutes of Health, and the United States Department of Agriculture - for comparable types of research. This report also makes recommendations on ways to streamline and bolster the accountability and transparency of NASA's current processes.
Review of NASA's Evidence Reports on Human Health Risks
Author: National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine
Publisher: National Academies Press
Published: 2017-03-24
Total Pages: 77
ISBN-13: 0309451221
DOWNLOAD EBOOK →This is the fourth in a series of five letter reports that provide an independent review of the more than 30 evidence reports that NASA has compiled on human health risks for long-duration and exploration spaceflights.This letter report reviews eight evidence reports and examines the quality of the evidence, analysis, and overall construction of each report; identifies existing gaps in report content; and provides suggestions for additional sources of expert input.
Review of NASA's Evidence Reports on Human Health Risks
Author: Board on Health Sciences Policy
Publisher:
Published: 2015
Total Pages: 0
ISBN-13: 9780309314510
DOWNLOAD EBOOK →Review of NASA's Evidence Reports on Human Health Risks 2014 Letter Report is the second in a series of five reports from the Institute of Medicine that will independently review more than 30 evidence reports that the National Aeronautics and Space Administration has compiled on human health risks for long-duration and exploration space flights. This report builds on the 2008 IOM report Review of NASA's Human Research Program Evidence Books: A Letter Report, which provided an initial and brief review of the evidence reports. This letter report reviews seven evidence reports and examines the quality of the evidence, analysis, and overall construction of each report; identifies existing gaps in report content; and provides suggestions for additional sources of expert input. The report analyzes each evidence report's overall quality, which included readability; internal consistency; the source and breadth of cited evidence; identification of existing knowledge and research gaps; authorship expertise; and, if applicable, response to recommendations from the 2008 IOM letter report.
Human Health and Performance Risks of Space Exploration Missions
Author: Jancy C. McPhee
Publisher: U. S. National Aeronautics & Space Administration
Published: 2009
Total Pages: 396
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOK →Review of NASA's Evidence Reports on Human Health Risks
Author: Institute of Medicine (U.S.). Committee to Review NASA's Evidence Reports on Human Health Risks
Publisher:
Published: 2016
Total Pages: 72
ISBN-13: 9780309380621
DOWNLOAD EBOOK →Review of NASA's Evidence Reports on Human Health Risks 2015 Letter Report is the third in a series of five reports from the Institute of Medicine that will independently review more than 30 evidence reports that the National Aeronautics and Space Administration has compiled on human health risks for long-duration and exploration space flights. This report builds on the 2008 IOM report Review of NASA's Human Research Program Evidence Books: A Letter Report, which provided an initial and brief review of the evidence reports. This letter report reviews seven evidence reports and examines the quality of the evidence, analysis, and overall construction of each report; identifies existing gaps in report content; and provides suggestions for additional sources of expert input. The report analyzes each evidence report's overall quality, which included readability; internal consistency; the source and breadth of cited evidence; identification of existing knowledge and research gaps; authorship expertise; and, if applicable, response to recommendations from the 2008 IOM letter report.
