Report of the Defense Science Board Task Force on Integrated Fire Support in the Battlespace

Report of the Defense Science Board Task Force on Integrated Fire Support in the Battlespace PDF

Author:

Publisher: DIANE Publishing

Published: 2004

Total Pages: 109

ISBN-13: 1428980237

DOWNLOAD EBOOK →

In 200, the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology and Logistics (USD(AT & L)) directed the Defense Science Board (DSB) to study the precision targeting of air-delivered munitions. The results of the 2001 Task Force were well-received within Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD), and in June 2003, USD(AT & L) directed the DSB to study the closely related topic of "integrated fire support in the battlespace." In this new study the 2003 Task Force applied an approach and methodology similar to the 2001 effort but focused instead on ground-based fires, sea-based fires, and close-air support. As directed in its terms of reference (TOR), the 2003 Task Force assessed the following: ̂ The adequacy of current and proposed munitions, ̂ The timeliness and accuracy of ISR systems, ̂ the adequacy of battlefield C(exp 3) systems, and ̂ Impediments to integrated fires. From October 2003 through April 2004, the Task Force met monthly to gather information.

Integrated Fire Support in the Battle Space

Integrated Fire Support in the Battle Space PDF

Author: Nincent Vitto

Publisher:

Published: 2005-07-01

Total Pages: 100

ISBN-13: 9780756748333

DOWNLOAD EBOOK →

This Task Force applied the methodology developed in another study on precision targeting to shorter range ground & sea launched weapon systems which operate under the control of the on-scene commander & are designed to provide fires, both organic & inorganic, in support of maneuver forces. This Task Force assessed the adequacy of current & proposed munitions; adequacy of Intell., Surveillance & Reconnaissance techniques & mechanisms to meet the needs of the tactical & operational battlefield forces; adequacy of battlefield command & control; impediments to fully integrated Air, Land & Sea fire support; & need for predictive engagement tools & derived intell. products to guide the commander in the use of forces to shape the outcome.

Report of the Defense Science Board Task Force on the Technology Capabilities of Non-DoD Providers

Report of the Defense Science Board Task Force on the Technology Capabilities of Non-DoD Providers PDF

Author:

Publisher: DIANE Publishing

Published: 2000

Total Pages: 106

ISBN-13: 1428981063

DOWNLOAD EBOOK →

This report is a product of the Defense Science Board (DSB). The DSB is a Federal Advisory Committee established to provide independent advice to the Secretary of Defense. Statements, opinions, conclusions, and recommendations in this report do not necessarily represent the official position of the Department of Defense. Attached is the report of the Defense Science Board Task Force on the Capabilities of Non-DoD Providers of Science and Technology, Systems Engineering and Test and Evaluation. This Study was requested by the Under Secretary of Defense (AT & L) in the Fall of 1998. The Terms of deterence directed that the Task Force make recommendations on: Non-DoD sources of Science and Technology and Systems Engineering - Processes tor out-sourcing of Science and Technology and System Engineering.

Report of the Defense Science Board Task Force on Joint Advanced Strike Technology (JAST) Program

Report of the Defense Science Board Task Force on Joint Advanced Strike Technology (JAST) Program PDF

Author: United States. Defense Science Board

Publisher: DIANE Publishing

Published: 1994

Total Pages: 137

ISBN-13: 1428982930

DOWNLOAD EBOOK →

The Joint Advanced Strike Technology (JAST) resulted from the decisions of the Secretary of Defense' Bottom Up Review (BUR). Each service has a demonstrated need for advanced technology aircraft to meet future contingencies, but it was determined that costs for development and production of these several different aircraft could not be met due to budgetary constraints. The BUR found that there were not enough resources available to support all these programs in future years. The decision was made to continue with the Air Force F-22 fighter aircraft, and the F/A-18E/F aircraft for the Navy, but to cancel the A/F-X and the MRF. The decision on ASTOL was to continue that research, but to secure specific commitment of resources by at least two of the three Services before building a flying prototype. The BUR also confirmed the continuing needs that were to be met by the A/F-X and MRF programs. This led to the establishment of the Joint Advanced Strike Technology Program in July 1993.

More Fight -- Less Fuel

More Fight -- Less Fuel PDF

Author: James R. Schlesinger

Publisher: DIANE Publishing

Published: 2009-12

Total Pages: 135

ISBN-13: 1437917143

DOWNLOAD EBOOK →

Examines DoD¿s strategy to achieve assured energy supplies. Identifies: opportunities to reduce fuel demand by forces and assess the effects on cost, operations and force structure; identify opportunities to deploy renewable and alternative energy sources for facilities and forces; identify institutional barriers to making the transitions recommended; identify and recommend programs to reduce facility energy use; and identify the benefits from DoD deployment of new energy technologies. There are 2 challenges: battlespace fuel demand compromises our operational capability and can jeopardize mission success; and critical missions at military installations are vulnerable to loss from commercial power outage and inadequate backup power supplies. Illus.

The Role of Autonomy in DOD Systems - Reports on Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV), Robotics, Teleoperation, Haptics, Centibot, Remote Presence, UxV, DARPA Research, and Space and Ground Systems

The Role of Autonomy in DOD Systems - Reports on Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV), Robotics, Teleoperation, Haptics, Centibot, Remote Presence, UxV, DARPA Research, and Space and Ground Systems PDF

Author: U. S. Military

Publisher:

Published: 2017-09-16

Total Pages: 120

ISBN-13: 9781549763373

DOWNLOAD EBOOK →

The DSB Task Force on the Role of Autonomy in DoD Systems was asked to study relevant technologies, ongoing research, and the current autonomy-relevant plans of the Military Services, to assist the DoD in identifying new opportunities to more aggressively use autonomy in military missions, to anticipate vulnerabilities, and to make recommendations for overcoming operational difficulties and systemic barriers to realizing the full potential of autonomous systems. The Task Force has concluded that, while currently fielded unmanned systems are making positive contributions across DoD operations, autonomy technology is being underutilized as a result of material obstacles within the Department that are inhibiting the broad acceptance of autonomy and its ability to more fully realize the benefits of unmanned systems. Overall, the Task Force found that unmanned systems are making a significant, positive impact on DoD objectives worldwide. However, the true value of these systems is not to provide a direct human replacement, but rather to extend and complement human capability by providing potentially unlimited persistent capabilities, reducing human exposure to life threatening tasks, and with proper design, reducing the high cognitive load currently placed on operators/supervisors.Unmanned systems are proving to have a significant impact on warfare worldwide. The true value of these systems is not to provide a direct human replacement, but rather to extend and complement human capability in a number of ways. These systems extend human reach by providing potentially unlimited persistent capabilities without degradation due to fatigue or lack of attention. Unmanned systems offer the warfighter more options and flexibility to access hazardous environments, work at small scales, or react at speeds and scales beyond human capability. With proper design of bounded autonomous capabilities, unmanned systems can also reduce the high cognitive load currently placed on operators/supervisors. Moreover, increased autonomy can enable humans to delegate those tasks that are more effectively done by computer, including synchronizing activities between multiple unmanned systems, software agents and warfighters--thus freeing humans to focus on more complex decision making.1.0 Executive Summary * 1.1. Misperceptions about Autonomy are Limiting its Adoption * 1.2. Create an Autonomous Systems Reference Framework to Replace "Levels of Autonomy" * 1.3. Technical Challenges Remain, Some Proven Autonomy Capability Underutilized * 1.4. Autonomous Systems Pose Unique Acquisition Challenges * 1.5. Avoid Capability Surprise by Anticipating Adversary Use of Autonomous Systems * 2.0 Operational Benefits of Autonomy * 2.1. Unmanned Aerial Vehicles * 2.2. Unmanned Ground Systems * 2.3. Unmanned Maritime Vehicles * 2.4. Unmanned Space Systems * 2.5. Conclusion * 3.0 Technical Issues of Autonomy * 3.1. Motivation: What Makes Autonomy Hard * 3.2. Defining Levels of Autonomy is Not Useful * 3.3. Autonomous System Reference Framework * 3.4. Needed Technology Development * 3.5. Technical Recommendations * 4.0 Acquisition Issues of Autonomy * 4.1. Requirements and Development * 4.2. Test and Evaluation * 4.3. Transition to Operational Deployment * 5.0 Capability Surprise in Autonomy Technology * 5.1. Overview of Global Unmanned Systems * 5.2. Unmanned Symmetric Adversary Scenarios * 5.3. Value for Asymmetric Adversaries * 5.4. External Vulnerabilities * 5.5. Self-Imposed Vulnerabilities * 5.6. Recommendations . * Appendix A--Details of Operational Benefits by Domain * A.1. Aerial Systems Strategy * A.2. Maritime Systems * A.3. Ground Systems * A.4. Space Systems * Appendix B--Bibliography * Appendix C--Task Force Terms of Reference * Appendix D--Task Force Membership * Appendix E--Task Force Briefings * Appendix F--Glossary