Report of the Committee on Immigration Appeals
Author: Great Britain Committee on Immigration Appeals
Publisher:
Published: 1967
Total Pages: 93
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOK →Author: Great Britain Committee on Immigration Appeals
Publisher:
Published: 1967
Total Pages: 93
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOK →Author: Great Britain. Committee on Immigration Appeals
Publisher:
Published: 1967
Total Pages: 93
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOK →Author: Grossbritannien Home Office Committee on Immigration Appeals
Publisher:
Published: 1967
Total Pages: 98
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOK →Author: Great Britain. Parliament. House of Commons
Publisher:
Published: 1967
Total Pages:
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOK →Author: Great Britain. Committee on Immigration Appeals
Publisher:
Published: 1967
Total Pages: 106
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOK →Author: Great Britain: Parliament: House of Commons: Constitutional Affairs Committee
Publisher:
Published: 2004-10-22
Total Pages: 5
ISBN-13: 9780215019837
DOWNLOAD EBOOK →A further response to the Committee's second report (HCP 211-I, session 2003-04; ISBN 0215015657), and following on from the Government's first response (Cm 6236, ISBN 0101623623) published in June 2004
Author: Great Britain. Parliament. House of Commons. Constitutional Affairs Committee
Publisher:
Published: 2004-03-02
Total Pages:
ISBN-13: 9780215015686
DOWNLOAD EBOOK →The purpose of this inquiry was to investigate the effects of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002, and examine the efficiency and fairness of the system of asylum and immigration appeals. However, since it was set-up, proposals for the appeals system have been updated and the Government has introduced the Asylum and Immigration (Treatment of Claimants, etc) Bill. The Committee has thus evaluated these new developments. They are concerned that the current reforms have been drafted to deal with the issue of asylum rather than addressing the problems of immigration appeals, and they do not see how abolishing the second tier of appeals will prevent abuse. They are also concerned about measures to restrict the jurisdiction of courts. As for the 2002 Act, there has been too little time to monitor the impact.