Birth Settings in America

Birth Settings in America PDF

Author: National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine

Publisher: National Academies Press

Published: 2020-05-01

Total Pages: 369

ISBN-13: 0309669820

DOWNLOAD EBOOK →

The delivery of high quality and equitable care for both mothers and newborns is complex and requires efforts across many sectors. The United States spends more on childbirth than any other country in the world, yet outcomes are worse than other high-resource countries, and even worse for Black and Native American women. There are a variety of factors that influence childbirth, including social determinants such as income, educational levels, access to care, financing, transportation, structural racism and geographic variability in birth settings. It is important to reevaluate the United States' approach to maternal and newborn care through the lens of these factors across multiple disciplines. Birth Settings in America: Outcomes, Quality, Access, and Choice reviews and evaluates maternal and newborn care in the United States, the epidemiology of social and clinical risks in pregnancy and childbirth, birth settings research, and access to and choice of birth settings.

Cesarean Delivery

Cesarean Delivery PDF

Author: Yvonne Cheng

Publisher:

Published: 2011

Total Pages: 266

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK →

Today, nearly 1 in 3 women giving birth will undergo cesarean delivery. This is far from the 1970s when only about 1 in 20 women have cesareans. Higher frequencies of cesarean deliveries, however, do not necessarily correspond with improved perinatal outcomes. In fact, neonatal outcomes have not improved in the past decades. It is well documented that cesarean delivery is associated with increased risk of maternal morbidity and mortality. Further, cesarean delivery can have a negative impact on perinatal outcomes of subsequent pregnancies, with higher risk of stillbirth and uterine rupture. Increasing number of repeat cesarean deliveries also correlates with increasing maternal morbidity. Data suggest that current cesarean delivery in the U.S. could be safely lowered without increasing infant mortality. Although numerous strategies have been suggested and tried to reduce cesarean delivery, it continues to rise at a rate disproportional to the changing maternal characteristics that may be partly responsible for the increase. The goal of this research is to identify potentially modifiable physician practice factors and patient characteristics that are associated with the increased risk of cesarean delivery. Identification of these risk factors is needed to develop strategies to curtail the current upward trend in use of cesarean delivery. As a first step to address this long term goal, this dissertation several analyses to investigated obstetric characteristics and practice patterns associated with cesarean delivery in United States based on existing datasets. Additionally, I conducted a survey study and collected clinician-level data to investigate obstetric providers' potential influence on the decision to recommend cesarean delivery. The Background chapter presents a brief history of cesarean delivery and reviews common indications of cesarean delivery. Cesarean delivery is often considered to impose some risks to the parturient, with the tradeoff of potentially conveying benefit to the fetus. Thus, this chapter also reviews maternal and neonatal morbidity associated with cesarean delivery, as well as potential health economic impact. First, to explore if pregnancy intervention, particularly, induction of labor, is associated with increased risk of cesarean delivery in the U.S., I used marginal structural models (MSM) to examine this research aim. In this analysis, the relation between induction of labor at a specific gestational age (e.g., 39 weeks) was compared to expectant management (delivery at a later gestational age, i.e., 40, 41 or 42 weeks, by either entering spontaneous labor or subsequently induction of labor for various medical/obstetric indications) and associated maternal/neonatal outcomes. This analytic approach is in contrast to traditional multivariable regression approaches that are pervasive in the obstetric literature. As multivariable regression analyses estimate the effect of association conditional on confounding covariates, it does not address specifically the risk of outcome for each subject under both exposed and unexposed conditions. Based on the concept of counterfactuals, MSM compares outcome frequency under different exposure distributions (exposed and non-exposed) in the same sample population and estimates the effect of exposure across the entire population. By applying causal inference framework through the use of MSM, this analysis estimated the population-level, marginal effect of induction on cesarean delivery and other perinatal outcomes that correspond to hypothetical interventions. Based on the MSM analysis, I show that induction of labor was associated with a decreased risk of cesarean delivery compared to expectant management. Next, I examined the association between advanced maternal age and cesarean delivery in the U.S. Delayed childbearing has become increasingly common in the U.S. Increase in maternal age has been associated with higher risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. Thus, I used the population intervention models to estimate the population attributable fraction of advanced maternal age (age>35 years at estimated date of delivery) on cesarean delivery. More specifically, population intervention models build upon the causal inference literature to model the difference of an effect between the distribution of a population in an observed environment (the actual study population) and a counterfactual treatment-specific population distribution (the population outcome that would have been observed under "intervention" such that the exposure would be at some target, optimal level). In this analysis, I used the population intervention models to estimate the potential changes in the distribution of cesarean delivery in low-risk population of nulliparous women who gave live births in the U.S. While maternal age cannot be easily "intervened" on, I chose to use population intervention models to gain insights into the potential changes in the distribution of cesarean delivery, focusing on the population prevalence of advanced maternal age as a risk factor. Through this analysis, I observed that advanced maternal age was a risk factor of cesarean delivery. While patient characteristics may influence the decision to undergo cesarean delivery, clinicians may also play an important role. However, few studies have been published regarding this topic. Thus, I conducted a cross-sectional survey study to explore provider characteristics that might be associated with increased likelihood of recommending cesarean delivery. I used multivariable logistic regression analysis fit by maximum likelihood to assess provider factors associated with an increased likelihood of recommending cesarean delivery. Further, I also used the Deletion/Substitution/Addition (DSA) algorithm to independently assess clinician factors associated with an increased likelihood to recommend cesarean. As multivariable logistic regression analysis was based on conditional probability to estimate the effect of the exposure-outcome association, this was in contrast to the DSA algorithm that used polynomial basis functions to identify predictors for the exposure-outcomes of interest based on cross-validation and the L2 loss function. As the current rise in cesarean delivery has profound impact on maternal and child health, there are also social and economic repercussions associated with rise in cesareans that are not yet well understood. This dissertation examined several increasingly common factors, including induction of labor, and advanced maternal age that might be associated with increased risk or increased likelihood of cesarean delivery. This work was achieved through the application of causal inference framework and analytical methods such as marginal structural models and population intervention models and the usage of nationwide birth data. Additionally, provider characteristics and experience information were collected via a cross-sectional survey to explore clinician-level information to identify factors driving the increase in cesarean delivery. These analyses serve as a first step towards the understanding of why cesarean delivery continues to increase in the U.S. and worldwide, but much work remains to be done.

Caesarean Section

Caesarean Section PDF

Author: Georgios Androutsopoulos

Publisher: BoD – Books on Demand

Published: 2018-09-26

Total Pages: 156

ISBN-13: 1789239311

DOWNLOAD EBOOK →

In this book, we present recent advances in surgical techniques as well as the most common perioperative complications in patients that undergo a cesarean section. Moreover, we discuss appropriate measures to reduce unnecessary procedures.

Vaginal Birth After Cesarean: New Insights

Vaginal Birth After Cesarean: New Insights PDF

Author: U. S. Department of Health and Human Services

Publisher: CreateSpace

Published: 2013-04-19

Total Pages: 414

ISBN-13: 9781484162323

DOWNLOAD EBOOK →

Despite the Healthy People 2010 national goal to reduce the cesarean delivery rate to 15 percent of births each year, this century has set record rates of cesarean deliveries. When the national rate of cesarean delivery was first measured in 1965, it was 4.5 percent, in 2007, almost one in three women in the United States (U.S.) delivered by cesarean (32.8 percent cesarean delivery rate in 2007). With almost 1.5 million cesarean surgeries performed every year, cesarean is the most common surgical procedure in the U.S. Vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) emerged from the 1980 National Institutes of Health (NIH) Consensus Conference on Cesarean as a mechanism to safely reduce the cesarean delivery rate. VBAC proved to be an effective contributor to reduce the use of cesarean through the early 1990s. From 1990 through 1996, the VBAC rate rose from 19.9 to 28.3 percent and the cesarean rate declined from 22.7 to 20.7 percent. Since 1996, VBAC rates have declined sharply, to the point where over 90 percent of women with a prior cesarean will deliver by repeat cesarean. While primary cesarean accounts for the largest number of cesarean deliveries, the largest single indication for cesarean is prior cesarean accounting for 534,180 cesareans each year, thus the safety of VBAC remains important. The degree to which cesarean deliveries and VBACs are improving or adversely affecting health remains a subject of continued controversy and uncertainty. This systematic review was conducted to inform the 2010 NIH Consensus Development Conference to evaluate emerging issues relating to VBAC. An evidence report focuses attention on the strengths and limits of evidence from published studies about the effectiveness and/or harms of a clinical intervention. The development of an evidence report begins with a careful formulation of the problem. The Evidence-based Practice Center (EPC) systematically reviewed the relevant scientific literature on key questions relating to VBAC assigned by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), the Planning Committee for the NIH Consensus Development Conference on VBAC: New Insights, the National Institutes of Health's Office of Medical Applications of Research (OMAR), and further refined by a technical expert panel (TEP). Ultimately, two background questions and four key questions were reviewed for this report: What are the rates and patterns of utilization of trial of labor after prior cesarean, vaginal birth after cesarean, and repeat cesarean deliveries in the United States? What are the nonmedical factors (provider type, hospital type, etc.) that influence the patterns and utilization of trial of labor after prior cesarean? Background questions will be addressed in the introduction of the report with information from reputable sources; however, these data are not part of the systematic review process. Key Questions include: 1. Among women who attempt a trial of labor after prior cesarean, what is the vaginal delivery rate and the factors that influence it? 2. What are the short- and long-term benefits and harms to the mother of attempting trial of labor after prior cesarean versus elective repeat cesarean delivery, and what factors influence benefits and harms? 3.What are the short- and long-term benefits and harms to the baby of maternal attempt at trial of labor after prior cesarean versus elective repeat cesarean delivery, and what factors influence benefits and harms? 4. What are the critical gaps in the evidence for decision-making, and what are the priority investigations needed to address these gaps?

National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement on Vaginal Birth After Cesarean

National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement on Vaginal Birth After Cesarean PDF

Author: Department of Human Services

Publisher: CreateSpace

Published: 2014-05-11

Total Pages: 48

ISBN-13: 9781499520194

DOWNLOAD EBOOK →

Vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) describes vaginal delivery by a woman who has had a previous cesarean delivery. For most of the 20th century, once a woman had undergone a cesarean delivery, clinicians believed that her future pregnancies required cesarean delivery. Studies from the 1960s suggested that this practice may not always be necessary. In 1980, a National Institutes of Health (NIH) Consensus Development Conference Panel questioned the necessity of routine repeat cesarean deliveries and outlined situations in which VBAC could be considered. The option for a woman with a previous cesarean delivery to have a trial of labor was offered and exercised more often in the 1980s through 1996. Since 1996, however, the number of VBACs has declined, contributing to the overall increase in cesarean delivery (Figure 1). Although we recognize that primary cesarean deliveries are the driving force behind the total cesarean delivery rates, the focus of this report is on trial of labor and repeat cesarean deliveries. A number of medical and nonmedical factors have contributed to this decline in the VBAC rate since the mid-1990s, although many of these factors are not well understood. A significant medical factor that is frequently cited as a reason to avoid trial of labor is concern about the possibility of uterine rupture-because an unsuccessful trial of labor, in which a woman undergoes a repeat cesarean delivery instead of a vaginal delivery, has a a higher rate of complications compared to VBAC or elective repeat cesarean delivery. Nonmedical factors include, among other things, restrictions on access to a trial of labor and the effect of the current medical-legal climate on relevant practice patterns. To advance understanding of these important issues, the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development and the Office of Medical Applications of Research of NIH convened a Consensus Development Conference on March 8-10, 2010. The conference was grounded in the view that a thorough evaluation of the relevant research would help pregnant women and their maternity care providers when making decisions about the mode of delivery after a previous cesarean delivery. Improved understanding of the clinical risks and benefits and how they interact with nonmedical factors also may have important implications for informed decisionmaking and health services planning. The following key questions were addressed by the Consensus Development Conference: 1. What are the rates and patterns of utilization of trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery, vaginal birth after cesarean delivery, and repeat cesarean delivery in the United States? 2. Among women who attempt a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery, what is the vaginal delivery rate and the factors that influence it? 3. What are the short-and long-term benefits and harms to the mother of attempting trial of labor after prior cesarean versus elective repeat cesarean delivery, and what factors influence benefits and harms? 4. What are the short- and long-term benefits and harms to the baby of maternal attempt at trial of labor after prior cesarean versus elective repeat cesarean delivery, and what factors influence benefits and harms? 5. What are the nonmedical factors that influence the patterns and utilization of trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery? 6. What are the critical gaps in the evidence for decisionmaking, and what are the priority investigations needed to address these gaps?

Recent Advances in Cesarean Delivery

Recent Advances in Cesarean Delivery PDF

Author: Georg Schmolzer

Publisher: BoD – Books on Demand

Published: 2020-04-15

Total Pages: 114

ISBN-13: 1789846943

DOWNLOAD EBOOK →

Recent Advances in Cesarean Delivery is a collection of research chapters on cesarean delivery and related developments within the field of obstetrics. Written by experts in the field, chapters cover such topics as prediction of cesarean delivery, hemostasis for massive hemorrhage during C-section, maternal and fetal risks, cesarean scar defect manifestations, obesity and C-section, and C-sections in low-, middle-, and high-income countries.

Ethics in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Ethics in Obstetrics and Gynecology PDF

Author: Laurence B. McCullough

Publisher: Oxford University Press, USA

Published: 1994

Total Pages: 300

ISBN-13: 9780195060058

DOWNLOAD EBOOK →

This book offers a comprehensive and clinically practical approach to ethics in the everyday practice of obstetrics and gynecology. The topics the authors address include: contraception, abortion, selective termination of multifetal pregnancies, gynecologic cancer, in vitro fertilization, surrogacy, prenatal diagnosis, fetal therapy, cephalocentisis, prematurity, HIV infection, and court ordered cesarean delivery. The issues involved in making decisions in many of these areas are a source of conflict, and lead to crisis between the physician and patient. One of the book's strengths is its emphasis on prevention and, if prevention fails, management, of the conflicts and crises which arise in these areas of medicine. The authors develop their preventative and management strategies on the basis of a framework for bioethics in the clinical setting. This framework is rigorously established and defended. The authors argue that four virtues -- self effacement, self sacrifice, compassion, and integrity -- generate the physician's obligation to protect and promote the patient's interest. They then identify the three types of patient's interests -- social role interests, subjective interests, and deliberative interests -- and they reinterpret the ethical principles of beneficence and respect for autonomy in terms of these. The concept of the fetus as patient, the physician's obligation to third parties, and the moral standing of fathers and family members are also addressed. The implications of their argument sets the stage for the discussions of prevention and management in the remaining sections of the book. Ethics in Obstetrics and Gynecology is a unique addition to the literature in both biomedical ethics and obstetrics and gynecology. It demonstrates that ethics should be regarded as an essential part of obstetrics and gynecology, and that clinical practice is incomplete without i