Navy Enterprises

Navy Enterprises PDF

Author: Jessie Riposo

Publisher: RAND Corporation

Published: 2009

Total Pages: 76

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK →

"The Navy Enterprise has evolved over the past decade to achieve various objectives from improving efficiencies through lean, six-sigma efforts to producing the workforce of the future. This evaluation of the participation of organizations within the Navy Enterprise in the Planning, Programming, Budgeting and Execution (PPBE) system (1) identifies and describes the current participation of Navy Enterprise organizations in PPBE and (2) identifies and assesses potential alternatives for Navy Enterprise participation. RAND analysts evaluated available documentation and conducted extensive interviews with nearly twenty senior leaders throughout the Navy. The biggest benefit of the Navy Enterprise construct from a PPBE perspective has been the increased communication between resource sponsors, providers, and warfighters, which has helped the Navy to better assess the cost and risk trade-offs of resource-allocation decisions. However, the additional workload borne by the enterprises and additional complexity brought into the PPBE process could be greater than the benefit."--Publisher's website

Navy Planning, Programming, Budgeting, and Execution

Navy Planning, Programming, Budgeting, and Execution PDF

Author: Irv Blickstein

Publisher:

Published: 2016

Total Pages: 0

ISBN-13: 9780833096142

DOWNLOAD EBOOK →

This tool documents key but enduring aspects of how the Navy implements the Planning, Programming, Budgeting, and Execution process so that action officers and Navy leaders can successfully navigate and effectively contribute to the process.

Analysis of the Navy's Planned and Executed Budgets and Their Effect on Supply Management - Military Construction and Personnel, Operation and Maintenance, Research, Naval Supply Systems Command

Analysis of the Navy's Planned and Executed Budgets and Their Effect on Supply Management - Military Construction and Personnel, Operation and Maintenance, Research, Naval Supply Systems Command PDF

Author: U S Military

Publisher:

Published: 2019-08-20

Total Pages: 90

ISBN-13: 9781687574503

DOWNLOAD EBOOK →

The Department of Defense (DoD) budget is the end product of the Planning, Programming, Budgeting, and Execution process, which is submitted to Congress two years in advance of execution. Thus, the DoD will always demonstrate a monetary difference between the planning and execution phases. A significant difference between the planning and execution affects providers such as Naval Supply Systems Command (NAVSUP), which is responsible for the managing and financing of materiel. From 2007 to 2017, there has been an average budget difference of $3.1B for Operation and Maintenance, Navy appropriation. NAVSUP receives the DoD budget requirements from resource sponsors and budget submitting offices (BSOs) and determines how to invest by utilizing an inflation category code (ICC) such as Consumable parts (412) and Repairable parts (503). This study analyzed the budget differences for ICC 412 and 503 from 2007-2017; it demonstrated which budget line items (BLIs) and BSOs had the most significant contribution to these differences. For ICC 412 and 503, our analysis showed the most significant differences were observed in the years 2007-2011 and 2014-2017, and that the BLIs Mission and Other Flight Operations (1A1A) and Mission and Other Ship Operations (1B1B) demonstrated the most significant budget differences. It was also determined that BSO for Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces, and Commander, U.S. Pacific Fleet had the most significant impact on the budget differences for these BLIs.This compilation includes a reproduction of the 2019 Worldwide Threat Assessment of the U.S. Intelligence Community.I. Introduction * II. The Planning, Programming, Budgeting, And Execution Process And The Navy Working Capital Fund * A. The Planning, Programming, Budgeting, And Execution Process * 1. Planning Phase * 2. Programming Phase * 3. Budgeting Phase * 4. Execution Phase * B. PPBE Process In The Department Of The Navy * C. Program Objective Memorandum * D. Appropriation * 1. Military Construction, Navy * 2. Military Personnel, Navy * 3. Operation and Maintenance, Navy * 4. Procurement * 5. Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation, Navy * E. Defense Financial Management Regulations * 1. History * F. The Naval Supply Systems Command * 1. Mission * 2. Supply Management * 3. NAVSUP Logistics Efficiencies * G. The Naval Working Capital Fund * 1. How It Operates (Process) * 2. Revolving Funds (Groups) * H. The Budget Submitting Office * III. Data Collection And Processing * A. Introduction * B. Data Gathering * C. Budget Difference Analysis * 1. O&M, N Budget Difference Analysis * 2. BLI Budget Difference * D. Inflation Category Code Analysis * IV. Data Analysis * A. BLI 1A1A * B. BLI 1B1B * V. Recommendations And Conclusion * A. Primary Research Question * B. Secondary Questions * C. Recommendations For Further Analysis * D. Conclusion * E. Recommendation To NAVSUP

Comparative Analysis of Navy and Marine Corps Planning, Programming, Budgeting and Execution Systems from a Manpower Perspective

Comparative Analysis of Navy and Marine Corps Planning, Programming, Budgeting and Execution Systems from a Manpower Perspective PDF

Author:

Publisher:

Published: 2005

Total Pages: 126

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK →

This study provides analysis, conclusions and recommendations to assist the Deputy Commandant (DC), Manpower and Reserve Affairs Department (M & RA) and DC, Programs and Resources Department (P & R) in structure and process decisions concerning Marine Corps Manpower budget execution. DC, M & RA is the owner of the Marine Human Resource Development Process (HRDP) and the Military Personnel Marine Corps (MPMC) appropriation sponsor, while the DC, P & R has budgetary (1517) authority for MPMC budget execution. In contrast, the Navy has both sponsorship and 1517 authority within one cell at N1. By comparing these two services' organizational factors and Planning, Programming, Budgeting, and Execution Systems (PPBES), relevant differences surface, conclusions are drawn, and recommendations offered for improvements. Recommendations include realignment of 1517 authority within MPMC execution, and the melding of the Programs and Budget Branch of Manpower Plans Division, M & RA with the Military Personnel Branch, Fiscal Division, P & R (RFM). This new office will be responsible for all facets of MPMC programming, budgeting, and execution.

Naval Analytical Capabilities

Naval Analytical Capabilities PDF

Author: National Research Council

Publisher: National Academies Press

Published: 2005-10-26

Total Pages: 102

ISBN-13: 0309095166

DOWNLOAD EBOOK →

Naval Analytical Capabilities assesses current Department of Defense initiatives and the Department of the Navy's progress in transitioning from a requirements-based to a capabilities-based organization. The report also provides recommendations aimed at improving the organizational structure of the Office of the Chief of Naval Operations to best position the Chief of Naval Operations to fulfill his Title 10 (U.S. Code on Armed Forces) responsibilities. This report addresses key elements of capabilities-based planning, examines Navy analytical processes, and recommends an approach to making improvements.