Habeas Corpus Proceedings and Issues of Actual Innocence

Habeas Corpus Proceedings and Issues of Actual Innocence PDF

Author: United States. Congress

Publisher: Createspace Independent Publishing Platform

Published: 2018-01-17

Total Pages: 422

ISBN-13: 9781983880605

DOWNLOAD EBOOK →

Habeas corpus proceedings and issues of actual innocence : hearing before the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, One Hundred Ninth Congress, first session, July 13, 2005.

S. Hrg. 109-1038

S. Hrg. 109-1038 PDF

Author: U. S. Government Printing Office (Gpo)

Publisher: BiblioGov

Published: 2013-09

Total Pages: 426

ISBN-13: 9781289375102

DOWNLOAD EBOOK →

The United States Government Printing Office (GPO) was created in June 1860, and is an agency of the U.S. federal government based in Washington D.C. The office prints documents produced by and for the federal government, including Congress, the Supreme Court, the Executive Office of the President and other executive departments, and independent agencies. A hearing is a meeting of the Senate, House, joint or certain Government committee that is open to the public so that they can listen in on the opinions of the legislation. Hearings can also be held to explore certain topics or a current issue. It typically takes between two months up to two years to be published. This is one of those hearings.

Federal Habeas Corpus

Federal Habeas Corpus PDF

Author: Charles Doyle

Publisher: Nova Publishers

Published: 2007

Total Pages: 82

ISBN-13: 9781600213021

DOWNLOAD EBOOK →

Federal habeas corpus is a procedure under which a federal court may review the legality of an individual's incarceration. It is most often the stage of the criminal appellate process that follows direct appeal and any available state collateral review. The law in the area is an intricate weave of statute and case law. Current federal law operates under the premise that with rare exceptions prisoners challenging the legality of the procedures by which they were tried or sentenced get "one bite of the apple." Relief for state prisoners is only available if the state courts have ignored or rejected their valid claims, and there are strict time limits within which they may petition the federal courts for relief. Moreover, a prisoner relying upon a novel interpretation of law must succeed on direct appeal; federal habeas review may not be used to establish or claim the benefits of a "new rule." Expedited federal habeas procedures are available in the case of state death row inmates if the state has provided an approved level of appointed counsel. The Supreme Court has held that Congress enjoys considerable authority to limit, but not to extinguish, access to the writ. This report is available in an abridged version as CRS Report RS22432, "Federal Habeas Corpus: An Abridged Sketch," by Charles Doyle.

How Wide Should the Actual Innocence Gateway Be? An Attempt to Clarify the Miscarriage of Justice Exception for Federal Habeas Corpus Proceedings

How Wide Should the Actual Innocence Gateway Be? An Attempt to Clarify the Miscarriage of Justice Exception for Federal Habeas Corpus Proceedings PDF

Author: Jennifer G. Case

Publisher:

Published: 2008

Total Pages: 41

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK →

This Note posits that the actual innocence standard for presenting new evidence to a habeas court should be further narrowed to exclude newly presented evidence. The gateway to the petitioner's constitutional habeas claims should be limited by a prerequisite that the petitioner present newly discovered evidence to support a claim of actual innocence. Part I of this Note discusses relevant background information on the writ of habeas corpus, including the specific requirements imposed on habeas petitioners by federal legislation. Part II addresses the current state of the law regarding the actual innocence exception in federal habeas corpus cases. Part III compares the quot;newly discoveredquot; standard with the quot;newly presentedquot; standard based on case law and policy concerns surrounding habeas corpus relief. Part IV takes a brief look at three states' approaches to dealing with the issue for additional guidance regarding which standard of evidence should govern. Finally, Part V concludes that U.S. courts should adopt the uniform approach that new evidence in an actual innocence habeas claim must be newly discovered evidence.