Evidential Legal Reasoning

Evidential Legal Reasoning PDF

Author: Jordi Ferrer Beltrán

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Published: 2022-05-19

Total Pages: 459

ISBN-13: 1316516997

DOWNLOAD EBOOK →

A global overview of evidentiary reasoning with contributions from leading authorities from different legal traditions and four continents.

Theory of Legal Evidence - Evidence in Legal Theory

Theory of Legal Evidence - Evidence in Legal Theory PDF

Author: Verena Klappstein

Publisher: Springer Nature

Published: 2022-01-03

Total Pages: 274

ISBN-13: 3030838412

DOWNLOAD EBOOK →

This book addresses theoretical problems concerning legal evidence. The concept of evidence is expected to fulfill a number of distinct roles in science and philosophy, but also in legal theory and law, some of which are complementary, while others are conflicting. In their profession, lawyers have to deal with evidence and proof. Yet the legal concept of evidence is constantly changing, and the debate concerning the distinction between a legal concept of evidence, the ordinary concept of evidence and the concept of evidence in science is far from being settled. What is more, the problem of evidence is central to both epistemology and the philosophy of science, and by extension to our academic thinking on law. In short, legal theorists’ interest in evidence may include such diverse objects as a bloody knife, sensory data, linguistic entities or psychologically recognized beliefs. The book surveys selected theoretical roles that the concept of evidence plays and explores their relations and interconnections. The content is divided into three parts, investigating: (1) evidence in epistemology and the philosophy of science, which focuses on evidence methodologies and the problem of proof in legal scholarship; (2) evidence in legal theory and legal philosophy, where particular attention is paid to the interplay between evidence, legal reasoning and the binding force of such reasoning; and (3) evidence in law, where theoretical problems pertaining to witnesses, expert opinions, explanations of the accused, statistical evidence and neuroscientific evidence are examined.

Arguments, Stories and Criminal Evidence

Arguments, Stories and Criminal Evidence PDF

Author: Floris J. Bex

Publisher: Springer Science & Business Media

Published: 2011-02-15

Total Pages: 297

ISBN-13: 9400701403

DOWNLOAD EBOOK →

In this book a theory of reasoning with evidence in the context of criminal cases is developed. The main subject of this study is not the law of evidence but rather the rational process of proof, which involves constructing, testing and justifying scenarios about what happened using evidence and commonsense knowledge. A central theme in the book is the analysis of ones reasoning, so that complex patterns are made more explicit and clear. This analysis uses stories about what happened and arguments to anchor these stories in evidence. Thus the argumentative and the narrative approaches from the research in legal philosophy and legal psychology are combined. Because the book describes its subjects in both an informal and a formal style, it is relevant for scholars in legal philosophy, AI, logic and argumentation theory. The book can also appeal to practitioners in the investigative and legal professions, who are interested in the ways in which they can and should reason with evidence.

Multi-criteria Analysis in Legal Reasoning

Multi-criteria Analysis in Legal Reasoning PDF

Author: Bengt Lindell

Publisher: Edward Elgar Publishing

Published: 2017-05-26

Total Pages: 240

ISBN-13: 1786430207

DOWNLOAD EBOOK →

Providing an accessible introduction to the application of multi-criteria analysis in law, this book illustrates how simple additive weighing, a well known method in decision theory, can be used in problem structuring, analysis and decision support for overall assessments and balancing of interests in the context of law.

Legal Argumentation and Evidence

Legal Argumentation and Evidence PDF

Author: Douglas Walton

Publisher: Penn State Press

Published: 2010-11-01

Total Pages: 400

ISBN-13: 9780271048338

DOWNLOAD EBOOK →

A leading expert in informal logic, Douglas Walton turns his attention in this new book to how reasoning operates in trials and other legal contexts, with special emphasis on the law of evidence. The new model he develops, drawing on methods of argumentation theory that are gaining wide acceptance in computing fields like artificial intelligence, can be used to identify, analyze, and evaluate specific types of legal argument. In contrast with approaches that rely on deductive and inductive logic and rule out many common types of argument as fallacious, Walton&’s aim is to provide a more expansive view of what can be considered &"reasonable&" in legal argument when it is construed as a dynamic, rule-governed, and goal-directed conversation. This dialogical model gives new meaning to the key notions of relevance and probative weight, with the latter analyzed in terms of pragmatic criteria for what constitutes plausible evidence rather than truth.

The Evidential Foundations of Probabilistic Reasoning

The Evidential Foundations of Probabilistic Reasoning PDF

Author: David A. Schum

Publisher: Northwestern University Press

Published: 2001

Total Pages: 572

ISBN-13: 9780810118218

DOWNLOAD EBOOK →

In this work Schum develops a general theory of evidence as it is understood and applied across a broad range of disciplines and practical undertakings. He include insights from law, philosophy, logic, probability, semiotics, artificial intelligence, psychology and history.

Thinking Like a Lawyer

Thinking Like a Lawyer PDF

Author: Kenneth J. Vandevelde

Publisher: Routledge

Published: 2018-04-19

Total Pages: 350

ISBN-13: 0429973888

DOWNLOAD EBOOK →

Law students, law professors, and lawyers frequently refer to the process of "thinking like a lawyer," but attempts to analyze in any systematic way what is meant by that phrase are rare. In his classic book, Kenneth J. Vandevelde defines this elusive phrase and identifies the techniques involved in thinking like a lawyer. Unlike most legal writings, which are plagued by difficult, virtually incomprehensible language, this book is accessible and clearly written and will help students, professionals, and general readers gain important insight into this well-developed and valuable way of thinking. Updated for a new generation of lawyers, the second edition features a new chapter on contemporary perspectives on legal reasoning. A useful new appendix serves as a survival guide for current and prospective law students and describes how to apply the techniques in the book to excel in law school.

Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory

Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory PDF

Author: Neil MacCormick

Publisher: Clarendon Press

Published: 1994-08-11

Total Pages: 322

ISBN-13: 0191018597

DOWNLOAD EBOOK →

What makes an argument in a law case good or bad? Can legal decisions be justified by purely rational argument or are they ultimately determined by more subjective influences? These questions are central to the study of jurisprudence, and are thoroughly and critically examined in Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory, now with a new and up-to-date foreword. Its clarity of explanation and argument make this classic legal text readily accessible to lawyers, philosophers, and any general reader interested in legal processes, human reasoning, or practical logic.

Evidential Reasoning in Archaeology

Evidential Reasoning in Archaeology PDF

Author: Robert Chapman

Publisher: Bloomsbury Publishing

Published: 2016-10-06

Total Pages: 264

ISBN-13: 147252893X

DOWNLOAD EBOOK →

How do archaeologists work with the data they identify as a record of the cultural past? How are these data collected and construed as evidence? What is the impact on archaeological practice of new techniques of data recovery and analysis, especially those imported from the sciences? To answer these questions, the authors identify close-to-the-ground principles of best practice based on an analysis of examples of evidential reasoning in archaeology that are widely regarded as successful, contested, or instructive failures. They look at how archaeologists put old evidence to work in pursuit of new interpretations, how they construct provisional foundations for inquiry as they go, and how they navigate the multidisciplinary ties that make archaeology a productive intellectual trading zone. This case-based approach is predicated on a conviction that archaeological practice is a repository of considerable methodological wisdom, embodied in tacit norms and skilled expertise – wisdom that is rarely made explicit except when contested, and is often obscured when questions about the status and reach of archaeological evidence figure in high-profile crisis debates.