Defense Acquisition Reform, 1960-2009

Defense Acquisition Reform, 1960-2009 PDF

Author: John Ronald Fox

Publisher: Government Printing Office

Published: 2012-03

Total Pages: 288

ISBN-13: 9780160866975

DOWNLOAD EBOOK →

Center of Military History Publication 51-3-1. By J. Ronald Fox, et al. Discusses reform initiatives from 1960 to the present and concludes with prescriptions for future changes to the acquisition culture of the services, DoD, and industry.

Acquisition Reform

Acquisition Reform PDF

Author: DIANE Publishing Company

Publisher: DIANE Publishing

Published:

Total Pages: 66

ISBN-13: 9780788141249

DOWNLOAD EBOOK →

This report: reviewed whether the selection of the DoD Acquisition Law Advisory Panel members and the operations of the Panel fulfilled the requirements of the Fed. Advisory Committee Act and the Panel's authorizing legislations; analyzed and described the info. gathering and analytical approaches the Panel used; and reviewed the Panel's report and determined the extent to which the report presents opposing, or otherwise differing, views to its recommendations for statutory change. This is not a review of the Panel's recommendations to retain statues.

Reexamining Military Acquisition Reform: Are We There Yet?.

Reexamining Military Acquisition Reform: Are We There Yet?. PDF

Author:

Publisher:

Published: 2005

Total Pages: 0

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK →

The Department of Defense (DoD) has a long history of seeking improvements in the way it goes about buying new weapon systems. In the past two decades alone, DoD has mounted two distinct movements that each carried the title "Acquisition Reform" (AR).' In the 1980s, reform efforts focused on reducing "waste, fraud, and abuse" in the system. In the 1990s, the emphasis shifted toward trying to make the acquisition process more responsive, effective, and efficient i.e., "faster, better, cheaper." Initiatives launched in the 1990s to support the latter goals included legislative changes to allow for more streamlined procurements, reductions in internal paperwork and required reviews, greater use of commercial practices, and expanded attempts to use the private sector to do more of the jobs traditionally done by government. DoD also sought ways to make it easier and more attractive for companies that previously had never worked for the DoD to begin pursuing military contracts; this was seen as a way to allow the military to tap into the expanded creativity and innovative prowess in developing and applying new technology that had come to the fore in the private sector, particularly in the 1990s.