Comparing Environmental Risks

Comparing Environmental Risks PDF

Author: J. Clarence Davies

Publisher: Routledge

Published: 2014-04-04

Total Pages: 177

ISBN-13: 1135890544

DOWNLOAD EBOOK →

The budgetary squeeze of the 1990s has made it obvious that the government cannot address every possible environmental problem. Comparative risk assessment (CRA) is increasingly advanced as the means for setting realistic priorities. RFF's Center for Risk Management commissioned background papers from leading experts on CRA for a meeting with federal regulatory officials. Comparing Environmental Risks presents the revised papers of this workshop. Representing the state of the art on programmatic CRA, its methodological analyses and practical recommendations will be invaluable to government officials, independent analysts, and anyone studying environmental policy.

Worst Things First

Worst Things First PDF

Author: Adam M. Finkel

Publisher: Routledge

Published: 2014-04-04

Total Pages: 363

ISBN-13: 1135890269

DOWNLOAD EBOOK →

For any government agency, the distribution of available resources among problems or programs is crucially important. Agencies, however, typically lack a self-conscious process for examining priorities, much less an explicit method for defining what priorities should be. Worst Things First? illustrates the controversy that ensues when previously implicit administrative processes are made explicit and subjected to critical examination. It reveals surprising limitations to quantitative risk assessment as an instrument for precise tuning of policy judgments. The book also demonstrates the strength of political and social forces opposing the exclusive use of risk assessment in setting environmental priorities.

Comparative Risk Assessment and Environmental Decision Making

Comparative Risk Assessment and Environmental Decision Making PDF

Author: Igor Linkov

Publisher: Springer Science & Business Media

Published: 2006-03-02

Total Pages: 431

ISBN-13: 1402022433

DOWNLOAD EBOOK →

Decision making in environmental projects is typically a complex and confusing process characterized by trade-offs between socio-political, environmental, and economic impacts. Comparative Risk Assessment (CRA) is a methodology applied to facilitate decision making when various activities compete for limited resources. CRA has become an increasingly accepted research tool and has helped to characterize environmental profiles and priorities on the regional and national level. CRA may be considered as part of the more general but as yet quite academic field of multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA). Considerable research in the area of MCDA has made available methods for applying scientific decision theoretical approaches to multi-criteria problems, but its applications, especially in environmental areas, are still limited. The papers show that the use of comparative risk assessment can provide the scientific basis for environmentally sound and cost-efficient policies, strategies, and solutions to our environmental challenges.

Comparing Environmental Risks

Comparing Environmental Risks PDF

Author: J. Clarence Davies

Publisher: Routledge

Published: 2014-04-04

Total Pages: 170

ISBN-13: 1135890617

DOWNLOAD EBOOK →

The budgetary squeeze of the 1990s has made it obvious that the government cannot address every possible environmental problem. Comparative risk assessment (CRA) is increasingly advanced as the means for setting realistic priorities. RFF's Center for Risk Management commissioned background papers from leading experts on CRA for a meeting with federal regulatory officials. Comparing Environmental Risks presents the revised papers of this workshop. Representing the state of the art on programmatic CRA, its methodological analyses and practical recommendations will be invaluable to government officials, independent analysts, and anyone studying environmental policy.

Environmental Priority-Setting in U. S. States and Communities

Environmental Priority-Setting in U. S. States and Communities PDF

Author: David Lewis Feldman

Publisher:

Published: 2000-03-01

Total Pages: 181

ISBN-13: 9780788142307

DOWNLOAD EBOOK →

How do states and local governments decide which environmental problems are most important to them? Are decisions about which environmental problems to address, and how to address them, based on the probable cost of remedies, Federal mandates, public clamor, science, or some combination of these and other factors? This report explores efforts by states and local governments to establish environmental priorities through comparative risk projects. This research is to better understand how priority setting efforts: (1) identify, characterize, rank and prioritized risks: (2) are used to reduce risks or provide amenities: (3) are evaluated; and (4) can be improved to better manage problems.