Assessing Battle Command Information Requirements and the Military Decision Making Process in a Concept Experimentation Program

Assessing Battle Command Information Requirements and the Military Decision Making Process in a Concept Experimentation Program PDF

Author:

Publisher:

Published: 1998

Total Pages: 88

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK →

"This report describes a concept experimentation assessment of battle command information requirements and military decision making in the 2010-2015 timeframe. This research was the first in a series of concept experimentation programs (CEPs) planned by the Mounted Battlespace Battle Lab (MBBL) at Fort Knox, KY, to re-engineer command and staff operations. This report focuses on research methods, exploratory results, and recommendations on method improvements for assessing battle command information requirements and the military decision making process (MDMP). The exploratory results provide a benchmark for future efforts and suggestions for improving information systems and future evaluations. Limitations and lessons learned on research methods are considered. Method recommendations address measurement approach issues, such as mission, enemy, terrain, troops, and time (METT-T) structure for determining information requirements, and the applicability of the MDMP in a real-time information environment. Recommendations on manual measures address the timing and scope of assessment and respondent workload. Finally, recommendations on instrumented measures stress reducing respondent workload and increasing measurement scope and precision."--Stinet.

Assessing Battle Command Information Requirements and the Military Decision Making Process in a Concept Experimentation Program

Assessing Battle Command Information Requirements and the Military Decision Making Process in a Concept Experimentation Program PDF

Author:

Publisher:

Published: 1998

Total Pages: 78

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK →

This report describes a concept experimentation assessment of battle command information requirements and military decision making in the 2010-2015 timeframe. This research was the first in a series of concept experimentation programs (CEPs) planned by the Mounted Battlespace Battle Lab (MBBL) at Fort Knox, KY, to re-engineer command and staff operations. This report focuses on research methods, exploratory results, and recommendations on method improvements for assessing battle command information requirements and the military decision making process (MDMP). The exploratory results provide a benchmark for future efforts and suggestions for improving information systems and future evaluations. Limitations and lessons learned on research methods are considered. Method recommendations address measurement approach issues, such as mission, enemy, terrain, troops, and time (METT-T) structure for determining information requirements, and the applicability of the MDMP in a real-time information environment. Recommendations on manual measures address the timing and scope of assessment and respondent workload. Finally, recommendations on instrumented measures stress reducing respondent workload and increasing measurement scope and precision.

Assessing Battle Command Information Requirements and the Military Decision Making Process in a Concept Experimentation Program

Assessing Battle Command Information Requirements and the Military Decision Making Process in a Concept Experimentation Program PDF

Author: Carl W. Lickteig

Publisher:

Published: 1998-12-01

Total Pages: 78

ISBN-13: 9781423554646

DOWNLOAD EBOOK →

This report describes a concept experimentation assessment of battle command information requirements and military decision making in the 2010-2015 timeframe. This research was the first in a series of concept experimentation programs (CEPs) planned by the Mounted Battlespace Battle Lab (MBBL) at Fort Knox, KY, to re-engineer command and staff operations. This report focuses on research methods, exploratory results, and recommendations on method improvements for assessing battle command information requirements and the military decision making process (MDMP). The exploratory results provide a benchmark for future efforts and suggestions for improving information systems and future evaluations. Limitations and lessons learned on research methods are considered. Method recommendations address measurement approach issues, such as mission, enemy, terrain, troops, and time (METT-T) structure for determining information requirements, and the applicability of the MDMP in a real-time information environment. Recommendations on manual measures address the timing and scope of assessment and respondent workload. Finally, recommendations on instrumented measures stress reducing respondent workload and increasing measurement scope and precision.

ARL Insights from the Battle Command Re-engineering III Concept Experimentation Program

ARL Insights from the Battle Command Re-engineering III Concept Experimentation Program PDF

Author: Michael G. Golden

Publisher:

Published: 2000-02-01

Total Pages: 71

ISBN-13: 9781423552291

DOWNLOAD EBOOK →

The Mounted Maneuver Battle Laboratory at Fort Knox, Kentucky, conducted the third battle command re-engineering experiment (BCR III), during the period of April 12 to April 30, 1999. This report describes the research efforts of the Human Research and Engineering (HRED) of the U.S. Army Research Laboratory (ARL) in support of BCR III. This research is a key element of the ARL 5-year science and technology objective (STO) IV.G.10: cognitive engineering of the digitized battlefield. For BCR III, ARL's efforts were centered on the virtual exercise in which a model future strike force variant organization with modular semi-automated forces (ModSAF)-based displays and advanced combat systems, performed battle command operations in order to gain a more robust understanding of the potential offered by these technological and organizational capabilities. Within the framework of the BCR III overarching issues, ARL's focal point was associated with the sub-issue question: What is the impact of situational awareness certainty and its cognitive effect on decision making, information request, and staff dynamics? This report cites the findings from the application of two ARL cognitive engineering-based research instruments, as well as observation-based insights and commanders' comments recorded during a focus group session held by ARL following the final after-action review. The two ARL instruments, the decision maker self-report profile (DMSRP) and the commander- centered decision environment inventory (C2DEI) focused on the various cognitive processes and environmental complexities associated with battle command decision making experienced during BCR III.

Lanterna Rally - Theme by Grace Themes