An Analysis of the Budget Formulation and Execution Process in United States Naval Dental Centers and Performance Measure Utilization in the Process

An Analysis of the Budget Formulation and Execution Process in United States Naval Dental Centers and Performance Measure Utilization in the Process PDF

Author: Roberto F. Ecarma

Publisher:

Published: 2002-12

Total Pages: 139

ISBN-13: 9781423505686

DOWNLOAD EBOOK →

The purpose of this research is to examine the Planning, Programming, and Budgeting process within the Naval Dental Centers (NDCs) as well as their particular budget formulation and execution procedures. Since there has been no extensive research done concerning budgeting and Naval Dental Centers, this thesis stands as a small-scale representative of budgetary processes in this small hut vital section of the military. Moreover, the lack of dental readiness among personnel of operational commands recently debated in Congress during the summer of 2002 illustrates the critical nature of this topic. To analyze the topic in depth, the following points, among others, concerning budgetary policies of Naval Dental Centers must he examined; how do NDCs fit in the overall budgeting process of the Navy, how do NDCs formulate and execute budgets, what are their core missions, how do marks and reclamas affect the process, what factors affect the disparity between the funding NDCs request and what they actually receive, what performance measures are compiled and what role do they play in the budgeting process. The specific goal of this study is to provide prospective NDC comptrollers with the insight into procedures, technicalities, and peculiarities of a Medical Service Corps comptroller's job in a Naval Dental Center command.

Analysis of the Navy's Planned and Executed Budgets and Their Effect on Supply Management - Military Construction and Personnel, Operation and Maintenance, Research, Naval Supply Systems Command

Analysis of the Navy's Planned and Executed Budgets and Their Effect on Supply Management - Military Construction and Personnel, Operation and Maintenance, Research, Naval Supply Systems Command PDF

Author: U S Military

Publisher:

Published: 2019-08-20

Total Pages: 90

ISBN-13: 9781687574503

DOWNLOAD EBOOK →

The Department of Defense (DoD) budget is the end product of the Planning, Programming, Budgeting, and Execution process, which is submitted to Congress two years in advance of execution. Thus, the DoD will always demonstrate a monetary difference between the planning and execution phases. A significant difference between the planning and execution affects providers such as Naval Supply Systems Command (NAVSUP), which is responsible for the managing and financing of materiel. From 2007 to 2017, there has been an average budget difference of $3.1B for Operation and Maintenance, Navy appropriation. NAVSUP receives the DoD budget requirements from resource sponsors and budget submitting offices (BSOs) and determines how to invest by utilizing an inflation category code (ICC) such as Consumable parts (412) and Repairable parts (503). This study analyzed the budget differences for ICC 412 and 503 from 2007-2017; it demonstrated which budget line items (BLIs) and BSOs had the most significant contribution to these differences. For ICC 412 and 503, our analysis showed the most significant differences were observed in the years 2007-2011 and 2014-2017, and that the BLIs Mission and Other Flight Operations (1A1A) and Mission and Other Ship Operations (1B1B) demonstrated the most significant budget differences. It was also determined that BSO for Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces, and Commander, U.S. Pacific Fleet had the most significant impact on the budget differences for these BLIs.This compilation includes a reproduction of the 2019 Worldwide Threat Assessment of the U.S. Intelligence Community.I. Introduction * II. The Planning, Programming, Budgeting, And Execution Process And The Navy Working Capital Fund * A. The Planning, Programming, Budgeting, And Execution Process * 1. Planning Phase * 2. Programming Phase * 3. Budgeting Phase * 4. Execution Phase * B. PPBE Process In The Department Of The Navy * C. Program Objective Memorandum * D. Appropriation * 1. Military Construction, Navy * 2. Military Personnel, Navy * 3. Operation and Maintenance, Navy * 4. Procurement * 5. Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation, Navy * E. Defense Financial Management Regulations * 1. History * F. The Naval Supply Systems Command * 1. Mission * 2. Supply Management * 3. NAVSUP Logistics Efficiencies * G. The Naval Working Capital Fund * 1. How It Operates (Process) * 2. Revolving Funds (Groups) * H. The Budget Submitting Office * III. Data Collection And Processing * A. Introduction * B. Data Gathering * C. Budget Difference Analysis * 1. O&M, N Budget Difference Analysis * 2. BLI Budget Difference * D. Inflation Category Code Analysis * IV. Data Analysis * A. BLI 1A1A * B. BLI 1B1B * V. Recommendations And Conclusion * A. Primary Research Question * B. Secondary Questions * C. Recommendations For Further Analysis * D. Conclusion * E. Recommendation To NAVSUP

A Multidimensional Analysis of DOA'S Budgetary Process Using Zero Base Budgeting and the Training Management Control System

A Multidimensional Analysis of DOA'S Budgetary Process Using Zero Base Budgeting and the Training Management Control System PDF

Author: Royal A Brown (III.)

Publisher:

Published: 1979

Total Pages: 271

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK →

This thesis report is a multidimensional analysis of the Federal budgeting process as it pertains to the United States Army financial manager. Summarized information is presented concerning the evolution and current state of the Federal Budget System. The Planning, Programming, and Budgeting System is described both with respect to its origin and present application. The concept, process, and Federal implementation of Zero Base Budgeting is discussed. The Training Management Control System as a new budgeting tool to justify Operation and Maintenance, Army Program 2 mission funds is introduced. A methodology applying the interface of the Training Management Control System and Zero Base Budgeting is developed for utilization in the budgeting process. The cruciality of program evaluation budgetary performance feedbacks are discussed. Recommendations are included describing ways improvements can be made in: the Training Management Control System, the budgeting process for training dollars and the development of effectiveness measures. (Author).

Lanterna Rally - Theme by Grace Themes