Alternative Dispute Resolution for Government Contracts

Alternative Dispute Resolution for Government Contracts PDF

Author: Donald P. Arnavas

Publisher: Wolters Kluwer

Published: 2004-01-01

Total Pages: 298

ISBN-13: 0808009788

DOWNLOAD EBOOK →

Alternative Dispute Resolution for Government Contracts from CCH is the only resource that provides a comprehensive treatment of ADR in government contracts. It presents a complete discussion of the various ADR procedures together with their advantages and disadvantages, allowing readers to reach an informed decision as to which ADR mode is most suitable for resolution of a specific dispute. Along with covering the Administrative Dispute Resolution Act of 1996, Executive Orders and other applicable regulations are thoroughly discussed. Alternative Dispute Resolution for Government Contracts covers the "hot" areas of ADR, including confidentiality, conflicts of interest, finality of arbitration awards, enforcement of awards and settlement agreements together with all the relevant citations. It will also help you analyze which type of approach is most effective for each of the main ADR processes and the preparation necessary for all members of an ADR team..

Alternative Dispute Resolution

Alternative Dispute Resolution PDF

Author: David S. Eaton

Publisher:

Published: 1993

Total Pages: 109

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK →

While arbitration and mediation have gained almost universal acceptance for settling commercial contract disputes, resolution of contract disputes in the Federal Government has continued to be slow, time consuming, and expensive. The participants in these processes have turned toward a new approach that offers an expedient, inexpensive, and less adversarial method for settling these disputes known as Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR). This thesis provides information on various methods of ADR, detailing advantages, disadvantages, and characteristics for case suitability. The research found, through the interviews conducted and the literature reviewed, that there are general misconceptions and impediments to the implementation of ADR. There was a general lack of knowledge of the different methods of ADR available. Many of the personnel interviewed did not know of their full authority to use ADR as provided by the Administrative Dispute Resolution Act. One major obstacle that was found in evaluating ADR is that there is an absence of reliable data to support the claims of ADR. Personnel interviewed in the Federal Government indicated that there is a lack of incentives for the Government to use ADR. One reason for this was due to the use of the 'continued performance clause.

Alternative Dispute Resolution

Alternative Dispute Resolution PDF

Author: David S. Eaton

Publisher:

Published: 1993

Total Pages: 0

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK →

While arbitration and mediation have gained almost universal acceptance for settling commercial contract disputes, resolution of contract disputes in the Federal Government has continued to be slow, time consuming, and expensive. The participants in these processes have turned toward a new approach that offers an expedient, inexpensive, and less adversarial method for settling these disputes known as Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR). This thesis provides information on various methods of ADR, detailing advantages, disadvantages, and characteristics for case suitability. The research found, through the interviews conducted and the literature reviewed, that there are general misconceptions and impediments to the implementation of ADR. There was a general lack of knowledge of the different methods of ADR available. Many of the personnel interviewed did not know of their full authority to use ADR as provided by the Administrative Dispute Resolution Act. One major obstacle that was found in evaluating ADR is that there is an absence of reliable data to support the claims of ADR. Personnel interviewed in the Federal Government indicated that there is a lack of incentives for the Government to use ADR. One reason for this was due to the use of the 'continued performance clause.

An Evaluation of the Merits of Mandatory Mediation in Federal Government Contracting

An Evaluation of the Merits of Mandatory Mediation in Federal Government Contracting PDF

Author: Christopher P. Smith (M. of Public Affairs)

Publisher:

Published: 2011

Total Pages: 116

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK →

Traditionally, parties to a government contract have sought administrative or judicial review to resolve disputes; however, appeals to these courts are costly and may take years to reach a conclusion. Congress has encouraged the use of Alternative Dispute Resolution methods to resolve disputes arising in federal government contracting. Alternative Dispute Resolution includes a broad range of techniques, including mediation; however, use of Alternative Dispute Resolution to resolve disputes in contracting has focused on arbitration. Arbitration is the Alternative Dispute Resolution method most similar to a trial. Attorneys largely lead the resolution of these contractual disputes given their expertise in contract law. This expertise in contract law as well as comfort and familiarity with the litigation process may encourage attorneys to select arbitration over other means of Alternative Dispute Resolution that may be more beneficial to all parties. "Lawyers bred in litigation may not realize when one or more of the techniques in the ADR procedural array may be far preferable to court litigation, and they may take an unnecessarily narrow view of their clients' interests" (Section of Administrative Law and Regulatory Practice, 2001). "Arbitration has become expensive and time consuming because of increasing demands for discovery (a process through which both parties exchange information prior to an administrative or judicial hearing), which results in an unintended consequence of participants not fully engaging in Alternative Dispute Resolution processes. The increased costs of arbitration associated with the discovery process encourages disputants to forgo investing in Alternative Dispute Resolution methods and proceed directly to administrative or judicial hearings where the parties can get a final ruling on the merits of the case with limited appeals options. If Alternative Dispute Resolution is to fulfill its original mandate or promise, parties must find resolution before the parties even get to arbitration. To encourage a fuller exploration of other Alternative Dispute Resolution methods, federal contracts should include mandatory dispute avoidance measures and mediation. Mediation should be required before parties can proceed with a grievance or a lawsuit.

Government Contract Litigation Best Practices

Government Contract Litigation Best Practices PDF

Author: Aspatore Books

Publisher:

Published: 2006-04-01

Total Pages: 147

ISBN-13: 9781596223820

DOWNLOAD EBOOK →

Government Contract Litigation Best Practices is an authoritative, insider's perspective on best practices for litigating government contract disputes. Featuring partners and chairs from some of nation's leading firms, these experts guide the reader through the intricacies of a government contract lawsuit, including important differences and similarities between commercial and government contract litigation, the regulations that govern government contracts and the conduct of government officials, and key differences between the forums available for dispute resolution. These top lawyers give tips on structuring bid protests, how to interest the government in alternative dispute resolution when appropriate, how to recognize and take advantage of settlement opportunities, and how to handle the possibility of collateral attacks.

The Use of Alternative Dispute Resolution Techniques to Resolve Government Contract Disputes: A Case Study

The Use of Alternative Dispute Resolution Techniques to Resolve Government Contract Disputes: A Case Study PDF

Author: John N Kraus (Jr)

Publisher:

Published: 1991

Total Pages: 91

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK →

The purpose of this study was to examine the decision-making processes involved in using Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) techniques in lieu of litigation to resolve government contract disputes. With the enactment of Public Law 101-552, The Administrative Dispute Resolution Act, federal agencies are encouraged to use mediation, arbitration, and other ADR techniques for the prompt and informal resolution of disputes. Although the use of ADR in the private sector is increasing dramatically, use within the government has been minimal, in part, because of a general lack of knowledge about ADR and its practical application. An initial step towards broadening the knowledge base is to document the decision-making processes in cases where ADR has been used. A descriptive case study method was used to evaluate six completed ADR cases and one as yet unresolved case. Each was examined to determine: why the parties used ADR instead of litigation; how the specific ADR techniques were chosen, and; how and on what basis the neutral advisor was chosen. Based on the data generated from each case, patterns and trends across the cases were identified.