29th Clinical Aphasiology Conference

29th Clinical Aphasiology Conference PDF

Author: Kevin P. Kearns

Publisher: Psychology Press

Published: 2000

Total Pages: 236

ISBN-13: 9781841699059

DOWNLOAD EBOOK →

Papers in this volume were drawn from presentations at the 29th Annual Clinical Aphasiology Conference in Key West, Florida, USA, in June, 1999. A Wide range of topics is included in the issue including a series of papers that address qualitative research methods in aphasia. The broad range of clinical issues published in this special edition include investigations of individuals with aphasia, right brain damage, traumatic brain injury, and apraxia of speech. The contents of the journal will be of interest to experienced researchers and clinicians as well as students in training.

36th Clinical Aphasiology Conference

36th Clinical Aphasiology Conference PDF

Author: Audrey Holland

Publisher: Psychology Press

Published: 2008-03

Total Pages: 0

ISBN-13: 9781841698281

DOWNLOAD EBOOK →

This is the annual published proceedings of the 36th Clinical Aphasiology Conference (CAC). It was held in Ghent, Belgium, and was the first CAC meeting to be held outside North America. As a result, the 2006 CAC attracted a substantial number of submissions from European researchers and clinicians, many of whom had never attended CAC before. Included in this issue are papers that have been peer reviewed and selected from among the papers and posters presented at CAC. Both theoretical and clinical papers relevant to the provision of clinical services to people with aphasia are included.

30th Annual Clinical Aphasiology Conference

30th Annual Clinical Aphasiology Conference PDF

Author: Kevin Kearns

Publisher: Psychology Press

Published: 2002-02-01

Total Pages: 216

ISBN-13: 9781841699196

DOWNLOAD EBOOK →

The papers that appear in this volume were drawn from presentations at the 30th Annual Clinical Aphasiology Conference in Waikoloa Beach, Hawaii, USA, in May 2000. Acceptance of a paper from the CAC conference indicates that the paper has met the standards of Aphasiology and the rigours of merit review that represent the journal.